Comparing Deep Learning and Statistical Detectors for TS InSAR Change-Point Detection: A Hybrid Pipeline Approach

Abstract. Accurate detection of change points (CPs) and turning points (TPs) in Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) time series (TS InSAR) is critical for reliable geohazard monitoring and early warning systems. We introduce a standardized comparison to rigorously evaluate seven CP/TP detectors, encompassing four novel deep learning architectures (MLP, MALkCNN, ATGLSTM, CNN-LSTM), two established deep learning baselines (LSTM+TGLSTM, BiLSTM+U-Net), and a fast statistical detector (STPD). Our comprehensive evaluation spans 100,000 synthetic time series and real Sentinel 1 data stacks from diverse European geohazard sites (Italy, Germany, Iceland), quantifying performance through accuracy metrics (precision, recall, F1-score), change magnitude error (RMSE, mm·yr⁻¹), agreement with co-located GNSS stations (r), and computational throughput. Among the tested models, ATGLSTM demonstrates superior detection accuracy (F1 up to 0.93 on synthetic and 0.80 on real data), exhibiting remarkable robustness to speckle noise and temporal gaps due to its attention and time gating mechanisms. While CNN-LSTM yields the strongest agreement with GNSS measurements (r≈0.88), the STPD method provides unparalleled efficiency (~0.2 s per 1,000 series), confirming a distinct accuracy–efficiency trade off. Based on these findings, we propose a hybrid operational pipeline that leverages STPD for rapid, large scale screening and ATGLSTM for high precision refinement of flagged candidates. This two stage approach preserves optimal detection accuracy while substantially reducing computational cost, offering a scalable solution for operational TS InSAR monitoring. Our comparison, datasets, and code are made publicly available to catalyze future research and the development of robust, operational pipelines and multi sensor fusion frameworks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ISPRS annals of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-x-4-w8-2025-227-2026
Primary Topic
Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Applications and Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing Deep Learning and Statistical Detectors for TS InSAR Change-Point Detection: A Hybrid Pipeline Approach

Mehran Satari, Seyed Arya Fakhri
ISPRS annals of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences
Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Applications and Techniques
article

Comparing Deep Learning and Statistical Detectors for TS InSAR Change-Point Detection: A Hybrid Pipeline Approach

Mehran Satari, Seyed Arya Fakhri
article en

Abstract

Abstract. Accurate detection of change points (CPs) and turning points (TPs) in Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) time series (TS InSAR) is critical for reliable geohazard monitoring and early warning systems. We introduce a standardized comparison to rigorously evaluate seven CP/TP detectors, encompassing four novel deep learning architectures (MLP, MALkCNN, ATGLSTM, CNN-LSTM), two established deep learning baselines (LSTM+TGLSTM, BiLSTM+U-Net), and a fast statistical detector (STPD). Our comprehensive evaluation spans 100,000 synthetic time series and real Sentinel 1 data stacks from diverse European geohazard sites (Italy, Germany, Iceland), quantifying performance through accuracy metrics (precision, recall, F1-score), change magnitude error (RMSE, mm·yr⁻¹), agreement with co-located GNSS stations (r), and computational throughput. Among the tested models, ATGLSTM demonstrates superior detection accuracy (F1 up to 0.93 on synthetic and 0.80 on real data), exhibiting remarkable robustness to speckle noise and temporal gaps due to its attention and time gating mechanisms. While CNN-LSTM yields the strongest agreement with GNSS measurements (r≈0.88), the STPD method provides unparalleled efficiency (~0.2 s per 1,000 series), confirming a distinct accuracy–efficiency trade off. Based on these findings, we propose a hybrid operational pipeline that leverages STPD for rapid, large scale screening and ATGLSTM for high precision refinement of flagged candidates. This two stage approach preserves optimal detection accuracy while substantially reducing computational cost, offering a scalable solution for operational TS InSAR monitoring. Our comparison, datasets, and code are made publicly available to catalyze future research and the development of robust, operational pipelines and multi sensor fusion frameworks.

ISPRS annals of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciencesVol. X-4/W8-2025
University of Isfahan (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Applications and Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.