Air Quality Risks in Public Housing

Importance: Public housing residents face elevated environmental health risks, yet indoor air quality in these settings remains underexamined. Objective: To evaluate indoor air quality in public housing 5 years after implementation of the federal smoke-free housing policy and compare it with outdoor air quality in the same regions. Design, Setting, and Participants: A 1-year cohort study of indoor air quality (particulate matter ≤2.5 μm in diameter [PM2.5]) across 12 multifamily public housing communities in southeastern Virgina for individuals 65 years and older or persons with disability in cities with the highest rated outdoor air quality. Indoor PM2.5 was continuously measured using 117 air quality monitors in shared common spaces and hallways of buildings. Outdoor data were obtained from 3 nearby Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) monitoring stations. Data were collected from January 1 to December 31, 2023. Exposure: Federal smoke-free housing policy implemented in 2018 aimed at reducing indoor pollution from tobacco smoke. Main Outcomes and Measures: Daily PM2.5 concentrations indoors and outdoors classified using EPA-defined risk categories. A repeated-measures linear mixed model was used to assess daily concentration differences over the 1-year study timeframe. Results: In this study of 12 public housing communities, indoor PM2.5 levels were significantly higher than outdoor levels (mean indoor PM2.5, 23.33 μg/m3; 95% CI, 21.85-24.81 μg/m3; mean outdoor PM2.5, 8.42 μg/m3; 95% CI, 5.49-11.35 μg/m3; P < .001), with 95% of daily indoor readings in the moderate (PM2.5, 9.1-35.4 μg/m3) or worse EPA risk categories, while 69% of outdoor readings were classified as good (PM2.5, 0-9 μg/m3). Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this study suggest that, despite a strong outdoor air quality rating and a smoke-free housing policy, indoor air quality in public housing remains poor. The findings underscore the need for strong, multifaceted interventions to reduce indoor pollution and promote environmental health equity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JAMA Health Forum
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2026.1357
Primary Topic
Air Quality and Health Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Air Quality Risks in Public Housing

Jessica Meadows, Vaughan W. Rees, Kelli England, Kristen E. Moore et al.
JAMA Health Forum
Air Quality and Health Impacts
article

Air Quality Risks in Public Housing

Jessica Meadows, Vaughan W. Rees, Kelli England, Kristen E. Moore, Miasha T. O'Neal, Katie M. Jones, Andrew Plunk, Richard Grucza, Brynn E. Sheehan, Carolyn Caraballo Velez, Sarah Gehlert
article en

Abstract

Importance: Public housing residents face elevated environmental health risks, yet indoor air quality in these settings remains underexamined. Objective: To evaluate indoor air quality in public housing 5 years after implementation of the federal smoke-free housing policy and compare it with outdoor air quality in the same regions. Design, Setting, and Participants: A 1-year cohort study of indoor air quality (particulate matter ≤2.5 μm in diameter [PM2.5]) across 12 multifamily public housing communities in southeastern Virgina for individuals 65 years and older or persons with disability in cities with the highest rated outdoor air quality. Indoor PM2.5 was continuously measured using 117 air quality monitors in shared common spaces and hallways of buildings. Outdoor data were obtained from 3 nearby Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) monitoring stations. Data were collected from January 1 to December 31, 2023. Exposure: Federal smoke-free housing policy implemented in 2018 aimed at reducing indoor pollution from tobacco smoke. Main Outcomes and Measures: Daily PM2.5 concentrations indoors and outdoors classified using EPA-defined risk categories. A repeated-measures linear mixed model was used to assess daily concentration differences over the 1-year study timeframe. Results: In this study of 12 public housing communities, indoor PM2.5 levels were significantly higher than outdoor levels (mean indoor PM2.5, 23.33 μg/m3; 95% CI, 21.85-24.81 μg/m3; mean outdoor PM2.5, 8.42 μg/m3; 95% CI, 5.49-11.35 μg/m3; P < .001), with 95% of daily indoor readings in the moderate (PM2.5, 9.1-35.4 μg/m3) or worse EPA risk categories, while 69% of outdoor readings were classified as good (PM2.5, 0-9 μg/m3). Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this study suggest that, despite a strong outdoor air quality rating and a smoke-free housing policy, indoor air quality in public housing remains poor. The findings underscore the need for strong, multifaceted interventions to reduce indoor pollution and promote environmental health equity.

JAMA Health ForumVol. 7(5)
Harvard University (US), Washington University in St. Louis (US), Saint Louis University (US), Old Dominion University (US)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Air Quality and Health Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.