Rapid and reliable computational markers of decision-making for predicting daily smoking behavior and smoking cessation treatment outcomes

Addiction involves rapidly fluctuating affective and value-based decision-making processes that undermine cessation efforts, yet capturing these dynamics at clinically meaningful timescales remains challenging. Standard cognitive decision-making tasks are time-intensive and require many trials to achieve reliable parameter estimates, limiting their use longitudinally and in real-world settings. Here, we developed a rapid, smartphone-based framework that integrates ecological momentary assessment (EMA) with adaptive design optimization (ADO), a Bayesian method that enables reliable estimation of computational decision-making parameters from as few as 20-30 trials per task. We tested this framework in N = 79 individuals undergoing a 5-6-week smoking cessation program, who completed daily ADO-based delay discounting and risk/ambiguity tasks alongside EMA surveys assessing smoking behavior, craving, stress, mood, anxiety, and medication adherence. At the day-to-day level, elevated craving, depressive symptoms, and ambiguity tolerance predicted increased smoking the following day, whereas lower discounting rates and reduced craving and stress predicted cessation success at treatment completion. For the latter, models using data from the first week achieved meaningful predictive performance (mean AUC = 0.76), approaching the upper-bound performance observed in models incorporating both task and survey data from the full study period (mean AUC = 0.83). Together, these findings demonstrate that rapid, low-burden, ADO-based delivery of decision-making tasks via EMA can capture clinically relevant, dynamic vulnerability states during smoking cessation treatment. This methodology offers a promising approach for identifying cognitive markers that may facilitate or inhibit cessation success and informing personalized, time-sensitive intervention strategies for nicotine addiction and related psychiatric disorders.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuropsychopharmacology
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-026-02448-5
Primary Topic
Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rapid and reliable computational markers of decision-making for predicting daily smoking behavior and smoking cessation treatment outcomes

Hyeonjin Kim, Jeung-Hyun Lee, Hee‐Kyung Joh, Jaeyeong Yang et al.
Neuropsychopharmacology
Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
article

Rapid and reliable computational markers of decision-making for predicting daily smoking behavior and smoking cessation treatment outcomes

Hyeonjin Kim, Jeung-Hyun Lee, Hee‐Kyung Joh, Jaeyeong Yang, Hyung Jun Park, Anna B. Konova, Sang Min Lee, Woo-Young Ahn, Mark A. Pitt
article en

Abstract

Addiction involves rapidly fluctuating affective and value-based decision-making processes that undermine cessation efforts, yet capturing these dynamics at clinically meaningful timescales remains challenging. Standard cognitive decision-making tasks are time-intensive and require many trials to achieve reliable parameter estimates, limiting their use longitudinally and in real-world settings. Here, we developed a rapid, smartphone-based framework that integrates ecological momentary assessment (EMA) with adaptive design optimization (ADO), a Bayesian method that enables reliable estimation of computational decision-making parameters from as few as 20-30 trials per task. We tested this framework in N = 79 individuals undergoing a 5-6-week smoking cessation program, who completed daily ADO-based delay discounting and risk/ambiguity tasks alongside EMA surveys assessing smoking behavior, craving, stress, mood, anxiety, and medication adherence. At the day-to-day level, elevated craving, depressive symptoms, and ambiguity tolerance predicted increased smoking the following day, whereas lower discounting rates and reduced craving and stress predicted cessation success at treatment completion. For the latter, models using data from the first week achieved meaningful predictive performance (mean AUC = 0.76), approaching the upper-bound performance observed in models incorporating both task and survey data from the full study period (mean AUC = 0.83). Together, these findings demonstrate that rapid, low-burden, ADO-based delivery of decision-making tasks via EMA can capture clinically relevant, dynamic vulnerability states during smoking cessation treatment. This methodology offers a promising approach for identifying cognitive markers that may facilitate or inhibit cessation success and informing personalized, time-sensitive intervention strategies for nicotine addiction and related psychiatric disorders.

Neuropsychopharmacology
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US), Seoul National University (KR), Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KR), Samsung Medical Center (KR), Seoul National University Hospital (KR), National University College (PR), The Ohio State University (US)
National Research Foundation, Seoul National University, National Research Foundation of Korea, Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea, Institute for Information and Communications Technology Promotion, National Institute on Drug Abuse
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.