The Agentic Role of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Information Systems Leadership

<p>Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) is transforming information systems (IS) leadership by operating not merely as a technical tool but as an agentic actor that shapes authority, redistributes decision-making, and challenges governance structures. This study examines how senior IS leaders adopt and perceive GenAI in their organizations, focusing on its role in agenda setting, strategic forecasting, and ethical oversight. Using a mixed-methods design, survey data (n = 64) and interviews (n = 29) with chief information officers (CIOs), chief technology officers (CTOs), and IT directors across technology, finance, healthcare, government, and education were analyzed. Statistical findings show that leaders with advanced digital literacy and professional experience are significantly more likely to integrate GenAI into high-stakes decision-making (β = .46, p < .001), while transparency emerged as the strongest predictor of trust (factor loading = .79). Qualitative insights reinforce that leaders view GenAI as a “junior executive,” capable of narrowing options and influencing organizational priorities but requiring governance to preserve legitimacy. The results highlight conditional trust: while 81% of leaders acknowledged efficiency gains, only 64% expressed strong confidence in outputs without explainability mechanisms. Ethical concerns—bias, opacity, and accountability—were particularly pronounced in public and healthcare sectors, underscoring the need for participatory oversight boards, audits, and transparency dashboards. This study contributes a leadership-centered framework for governing GenAI as an agentic collaborator. It demonstrates that effective IS leadership must evolve beyond technical fluency to include ethical stewardship, orchestration of human–AI collaboration, and adaptive governance that safeguards accountability, fairness, and trust in the algorithmic age.</p>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The International Journal of Technology Knowledge and Society
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18848/1832-3669/cgp/a1033
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Agentic Role of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Information Systems Leadership

Ajmal Aminee
The International Journal of Technology Knowledge and Society
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

The Agentic Role of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Information Systems Leadership

Ajmal Aminee
article en

Abstract

<p>Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) is transforming information systems (IS) leadership by operating not merely as a technical tool but as an agentic actor that shapes authority, redistributes decision-making, and challenges governance structures. This study examines how senior IS leaders adopt and perceive GenAI in their organizations, focusing on its role in agenda setting, strategic forecasting, and ethical oversight. Using a mixed-methods design, survey data (n = 64) and interviews (n = 29) with chief information officers (CIOs), chief technology officers (CTOs), and IT directors across technology, finance, healthcare, government, and education were analyzed. Statistical findings show that leaders with advanced digital literacy and professional experience are significantly more likely to integrate GenAI into high-stakes decision-making (β = .46, p < .001), while transparency emerged as the strongest predictor of trust (factor loading = .79). Qualitative insights reinforce that leaders view GenAI as a “junior executive,” capable of narrowing options and influencing organizational priorities but requiring governance to preserve legitimacy. The results highlight conditional trust: while 81% of leaders acknowledged efficiency gains, only 64% expressed strong confidence in outputs without explainability mechanisms. Ethical concerns—bias, opacity, and accountability—were particularly pronounced in public and healthcare sectors, underscoring the need for participatory oversight boards, audits, and transparency dashboards. This study contributes a leadership-centered framework for governing GenAI as an agentic collaborator. It demonstrates that effective IS leadership must evolve beyond technical fluency to include ethical stewardship, orchestration of human–AI collaboration, and adaptive governance that safeguards accountability, fairness, and trust in the algorithmic age.</p>

The International Journal of Technology Knowledge and Society
Technical Solutions (United States) (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.