Interventions to improve pre-school vaccination timeliness: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Improving the timeliness of pre-school vaccinations (children aged 0 to 5 years) is an important public health goal to prevent outbreaks and maximise protection during early childhood. Multiple studies have highlighted the need for effective public health interventions to improve timely vaccination, and consequently the overall effectiveness of vaccination programmes. We aim to synthesise evidence on vaccination timeliness interventions and subsequently provide recommendations to improve pre-school vaccination timeliness in England. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomised studies. Studies were eligible if they were conducted in high-income countries and evaluated an intervention to improve timeliness of any pre-school vaccination on the United Kingdom (UK) national childhood vaccination schedule. Five databases and grey literature were searched to February 2025. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane risk of bias tools. Data were analysed using random-effects meta-analyses and synthesis without meta-analysis (using effect direction plots). RESULTS: Of the 10,385 records from database searches and 1490 records from citation searches, 33 studies were eligible (15 RCTs, 18 non-randomised studies). Most studies were conducted in the USA (n = 24) and reported on the timeliness of multiple pre-school vaccines (n = 23). Twelve studies (36%) were judged as serious or critical risk of bias, eleven at moderate and ten at low risk. Various intervention groups were identified: call-recall (n = 10), quality improvement (n = 9), education (n = 5), multicomponent (n = 5), combination vaccines (n = 2), communication (n = 1) and vaccination schedule change (n = 1). We found limited evidence from a small number of studies of a potential beneficial effect of combination vaccines, communication, quality improvement, education and schedule change interventions. CONCLUSION: We identified several possible interventions to improve pre-school vaccination timeliness. However, we found limited quantity and quality of evidence on this topic. We recommend further high-quality studies evaluating interventions to improve vaccination timeliness in England, and application of consistent vaccination timeliness definitions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Vaccine
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2026.128751
Primary Topic
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interventions to improve pre-school vaccination timeliness: a systematic review

Clare E. French, Saira Butt, Charles R. Beck, Colin N.J. Campbell et al.
Vaccine
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
article

Interventions to improve pre-school vaccination timeliness: a systematic review

Clare E. French, Saira Butt, Charles R. Beck, Colin N.J. Campbell, Koren Sanderson
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Improving the timeliness of pre-school vaccinations (children aged 0 to 5 years) is an important public health goal to prevent outbreaks and maximise protection during early childhood. Multiple studies have highlighted the need for effective public health interventions to improve timely vaccination, and consequently the overall effectiveness of vaccination programmes. We aim to synthesise evidence on vaccination timeliness interventions and subsequently provide recommendations to improve pre-school vaccination timeliness in England. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomised studies. Studies were eligible if they were conducted in high-income countries and evaluated an intervention to improve timeliness of any pre-school vaccination on the United Kingdom (UK) national childhood vaccination schedule. Five databases and grey literature were searched to February 2025. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane risk of bias tools. Data were analysed using random-effects meta-analyses and synthesis without meta-analysis (using effect direction plots). RESULTS: Of the 10,385 records from database searches and 1490 records from citation searches, 33 studies were eligible (15 RCTs, 18 non-randomised studies). Most studies were conducted in the USA (n = 24) and reported on the timeliness of multiple pre-school vaccines (n = 23). Twelve studies (36%) were judged as serious or critical risk of bias, eleven at moderate and ten at low risk. Various intervention groups were identified: call-recall (n = 10), quality improvement (n = 9), education (n = 5), multicomponent (n = 5), combination vaccines (n = 2), communication (n = 1) and vaccination schedule change (n = 1). We found limited evidence from a small number of studies of a potential beneficial effect of combination vaccines, communication, quality improvement, education and schedule change interventions. CONCLUSION: We identified several possible interventions to improve pre-school vaccination timeliness. However, we found limited quantity and quality of evidence on this topic. We recommend further high-quality studies evaluating interventions to improve vaccination timeliness in England, and application of consistent vaccination timeliness definitions.

VaccineVol. 87
Department of Health and Social Care (GB), University of the West of England (GB), At Bristol (GB), Public Health England (GB), University of Bristol (GB), NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre (GB), UK Health Security Agency (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.