What Do We Mean by Collaboration Processes? A Systematic Review of Research Design and Methods

ABSTRACT Despite the value of inter‐organizational collaboration in mission achievement, clarity on the internal “process” dimension of collaborative activity remains elusive and understudied compared to other partnership dynamics. This study offers the first comprehensive review of the multidisciplinary literature on nonprofit collaboration processes, examining 253 empirical studies. We introduce a three‐dimensional framework to guide our review, focusing on how scholars have conceptualized the collaboration process and chosen their strategies of inquiry. Our analysis identifies patterns across ontological, epistemological, and methodological approaches to studying this dynamic concept. We present six recommendations for future nonprofit and voluntary sector studies, highlighting how the dual meaning of the collaboration process and the variation in theoretical frameworks influence research strategies, how the temporal aspects of the collaboration process are often overlooked, and how variability in methodological quality, representation gaps in data, and the scarcity of engaged scholarship can limit our understanding of the internal dynamics of partnership formation and management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nonprofit Management and Leadership
Published
2026-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.70055
Primary Topic
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What Do We Mean by Collaboration Processes? A Systematic Review of Research Design and Methods

Beth Gazley, Danbi Seo, Chao Guo
Nonprofit Management and Leadership
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
article

What Do We Mean by Collaboration Processes? A Systematic Review of Research Design and Methods

Beth Gazley, Danbi Seo, Chao Guo
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Despite the value of inter‐organizational collaboration in mission achievement, clarity on the internal “process” dimension of collaborative activity remains elusive and understudied compared to other partnership dynamics. This study offers the first comprehensive review of the multidisciplinary literature on nonprofit collaboration processes, examining 253 empirical studies. We introduce a three‐dimensional framework to guide our review, focusing on how scholars have conceptualized the collaboration process and chosen their strategies of inquiry. Our analysis identifies patterns across ontological, epistemological, and methodological approaches to studying this dynamic concept. We present six recommendations for future nonprofit and voluntary sector studies, highlighting how the dual meaning of the collaboration process and the variation in theoretical frameworks influence research strategies, how the temporal aspects of the collaboration process are often overlooked, and how variability in methodological quality, representation gaps in data, and the scarcity of engaged scholarship can limit our understanding of the internal dynamics of partnership formation and management.

Nonprofit Management and Leadership
Indiana University Bloomington (US), Arizona State University (US), University of Pennsylvania (US)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.