Occupational Context Moderates the Association Between Agreeableness and Brain Structure

ABSTRACT Background Previous research on associations between personality traits and brain structure has yielded inconsistent findings, suggesting that such relationships may depend on contextual factors. Methods This study examined whether occupational context moderates the association between agreeableness and gray matter volume (GMV). Structural MRI data were obtained from 175 healthy working adults. GMV was quantified using the Gray Matter Brain Healthcare Quotient (GM‐BHQ), and personality traits were assessed using the Ten‐Item Personality Inventory. Participants were classified into knowledge workers and non‐knowledge workers. Hierarchical regression analyses were conducted controlling for demographic, lifestyle, psychological variables, and recruitment source. Results A significant interaction between agreeableness and occupational context was observed. Among knowledge workers, agreeableness was positively associated with whole‐brain GMV, whereas among non‐knowledge workers, it was negatively associated with GMV. These associations remained significant after adjustment for covariates. Exploratory analyses suggested similar patterns across multiple brain regions. Conclusions The association between personality traits and brain structure may vary depending on occupational context. However, given the cross‐sectional design and sample characteristics, these findings should be interpreted as associative rather than causal.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Brain Health
Published
2026-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/brh2.70009
Primary Topic
Personality Traits and Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Occupational Context Moderates the Association Between Agreeableness and Brain Structure

Keisuke Kokubun, Kiyotaka Nemoto, Yoshinori Yamakawa
Brain Health
Personality Traits and Psychology
article

Occupational Context Moderates the Association Between Agreeableness and Brain Structure

Keisuke Kokubun, Kiyotaka Nemoto, Yoshinori Yamakawa
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Previous research on associations between personality traits and brain structure has yielded inconsistent findings, suggesting that such relationships may depend on contextual factors. Methods This study examined whether occupational context moderates the association between agreeableness and gray matter volume (GMV). Structural MRI data were obtained from 175 healthy working adults. GMV was quantified using the Gray Matter Brain Healthcare Quotient (GM‐BHQ), and personality traits were assessed using the Ten‐Item Personality Inventory. Participants were classified into knowledge workers and non‐knowledge workers. Hierarchical regression analyses were conducted controlling for demographic, lifestyle, psychological variables, and recruitment source. Results A significant interaction between agreeableness and occupational context was observed. Among knowledge workers, agreeableness was positively associated with whole‐brain GMV, whereas among non‐knowledge workers, it was negatively associated with GMV. These associations remained significant after adjustment for covariates. Exploratory analyses suggested similar patterns across multiple brain regions. Conclusions The association between personality traits and brain structure may vary depending on occupational context. However, given the cross‐sectional design and sample characteristics, these findings should be interpreted as associative rather than causal.

Brain Health
University of Tsukuba (JP), Kyoto University (JP), Government of Japan (JP), Innovative Research (United States) (US), Tsukuba Medical Center Hospital (JP), Cabinet Office (JP), Kobe University (JP)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Personality Traits and Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.