Detecting and responding to fake responses to an online infant care survey in the UK

<ns3:p>Background This paper outlines the steps taken to identify fraudulent responses to an online survey of infant care practices and account for this in the subsequent analysis. A survey of infant care practices in England was conducted in 2022, offering a prize draw as an incentive, and promoted via social media with a public link. During the data cleaning process, it became clear that the survey contained fake responses and a process to identify and remove suspicious submissions was developed. Methods This method involved a 5-step process: 1) verifying genuine responses, 2) removing duplicate responses, 3) assessment of red and amber flags, 4) adding back in validated responses, 5) analysis of included and excluded responses. Results Overall, 209/3409 (6.1%) of responses were identified as suspicious and removed. Conclusion We present our reasoning at each stage of the process and suggest some principles which may be helpful for other research teams faced with a similar predicament.</ns3:p>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
NIHR Open Research
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3310/nihropenres.14281.1
Primary Topic
Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Detecting and responding to fake responses to an online infant care survey in the UK

Peter S Blair, Becky Lambert, Alice-Amber Keegan, Jenny Ingram et al.
NIHR Open Research
Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
article

Detecting and responding to fake responses to an online infant care survey in the UK

Peter S Blair, Becky Lambert, Alice-Amber Keegan, Jenny Ingram, Anna Pease, Peter J. Fleming
article en

Abstract

<ns3:p>Background This paper outlines the steps taken to identify fraudulent responses to an online survey of infant care practices and account for this in the subsequent analysis. A survey of infant care practices in England was conducted in 2022, offering a prize draw as an incentive, and promoted via social media with a public link. During the data cleaning process, it became clear that the survey contained fake responses and a process to identify and remove suspicious submissions was developed. Methods This method involved a 5-step process: 1) verifying genuine responses, 2) removing duplicate responses, 3) assessment of red and amber flags, 4) adding back in validated responses, 5) analysis of included and excluded responses. Results Overall, 209/3409 (6.1%) of responses were identified as suspicious and removed. Conclusion We present our reasoning at each stage of the process and suggest some principles which may be helpful for other research teams faced with a similar predicament.</ns3:p>

NIHR Open ResearchVol. 6
University of Bristol (GB)
National Institute for Health and Care Research, Department of Health and Social Care, University of Bristol
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.