Publication Trends in the Journal of Educational Measurement: A Bibliometric Network Analysis

Abstract This study examines the intellectual structure and historical development of the Journal of Educational Measurement over its six‐decade history (1964‐2025). Using computational text mining and network analysis, we analyzed 1,678 articles based on a deterministic, expert‐defined taxonomy of 34 psychometric categories to quantify research trends. Results identify item response theory (IRT) as the dominant paradigm and the most connected area in the publication network. Community detection reveals a tripartite structure dividing the discipline into psychometric modeling, applied test operations, and classical measurement foundations. While IRT constitutes the primary theoretical focus, parameter estimation and validity emerge as intermediary concepts linking statistical modeling to practical applications. The analysis also highlights a historical transition from classical test theory to latent trait modeling, with computerized adaptive testing and differential item functioning identified as major contemporary topics. Furthermore, artificial intelligence appears as an emerging area, showing limited activity for many years followed by rapid growth beginning in 2022, primarily driven by automated scoring research. Overall, these findings provide a data‐driven framework for monitoring how the field continues to evolve in response to technological developments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Educational Measurement
Published
2026-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jedm.70051
Primary Topic
Mental Health Research Topics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Publication Trends in the Journal of Educational Measurement: A Bibliometric Network Analysis

W C Lee, Juyoung Jung
Journal of Educational Measurement
Mental Health Research Topics
article

Publication Trends in the Journal of Educational Measurement: A Bibliometric Network Analysis

W C Lee, Juyoung Jung
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study examines the intellectual structure and historical development of the Journal of Educational Measurement over its six‐decade history (1964‐2025). Using computational text mining and network analysis, we analyzed 1,678 articles based on a deterministic, expert‐defined taxonomy of 34 psychometric categories to quantify research trends. Results identify item response theory (IRT) as the dominant paradigm and the most connected area in the publication network. Community detection reveals a tripartite structure dividing the discipline into psychometric modeling, applied test operations, and classical measurement foundations. While IRT constitutes the primary theoretical focus, parameter estimation and validity emerge as intermediary concepts linking statistical modeling to practical applications. The analysis also highlights a historical transition from classical test theory to latent trait modeling, with computerized adaptive testing and differential item functioning identified as major contemporary topics. Furthermore, artificial intelligence appears as an emerging area, showing limited activity for many years followed by rapid growth beginning in 2022, primarily driven by automated scoring research. Overall, these findings provide a data‐driven framework for monitoring how the field continues to evolve in response to technological developments.

Journal of Educational MeasurementVol. 63(2)
University of Iowa (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Mental Health Research Topics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.