Early Prediction of Sepsis-Related Coagulopathy: A Comparative Evaluation of Clinical Scoring Systems in the Emergency Department

Background: Early recognition of sepsis-related coagulation derangements may support timely risk stratification in emergency department (ED) patients with suspected infection. Evidence comparing coagulation-oriented scores in unselected “suspected sepsis” populations remains limited, particularly for predicting progression to sepsis, overt thrombotic/hemorrhagic events, and mortality. Methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study including consecutive ED patients evaluated for sepsis, suspected sepsis, or infection (January 2016–December 2024). Patients with overt disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) at admission were excluded. The Sepsis-Induced Coagulopathy (SIC), Japanese Association for Acute Medicine DIC (JAAM-DIC), International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) score, and Endothelial Activation and Stress Index (EASIX; and log2-EASIX) were calculated at admission. Outcomes were progression to confirmed sepsis (Sepsis-3), symptomatic coagulopathy (thrombotic and/or hemorrhagic events), and in-hospital mortality. Discrimination was assessed by ROC analysis (AUC with 95% CI) and clinical utility by decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: Among 11.274 patients without overt DIC, all scores showed moderate discrimination for mortality and sepsis progression. SIC performed best for in-hospital mortality (AUC 0.701, 95% CI 0.692–0.710) and for progression to confirmed sepsis (AUC 0.672, 95% CI 0.663–0.681). Prediction of overt thrombotic/hemorrhagic complications was poor across scores; ISTH yielded the highest (yet modest) AUCs for thrombotic events (0.614, 95% CI 0.604–0.623), hemorrhagic events (0.545, 95% CI 0.535–0.554), and combined coagulopathy (0.605, 95% CI 0.596–0.614). DCA suggested net benefit at low-to-intermediate threshold probabilities, particularly for SIC (and JAAM2) in early decision ranges. In the confirmed sepsis subgroup, discrimination attenuated overall; for combined coagulopathy, SIC showed the highest AUC (0.558, 95% CI 0.518–0.597). Conclusions: In ED patients with suspected sepsis and no overt DIC at presentation, SIC provides the strongest performance for early prognostic stratification (mortality and sepsis progression), whereas none of the evaluated scores reliably predict clinically overt thrombotic or hemorrhagic complications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15114199
Primary Topic
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Early Prediction of Sepsis-Related Coagulopathy: A Comparative Evaluation of Clinical Scoring Systems in the Emergency Department

Davide Antonio Della Polla, Pietro Fanelli, Gianluca Tullo, Stefania Gemma et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Early Prediction of Sepsis-Related Coagulopathy: A Comparative Evaluation of Clinical Scoring Systems in the Emergency Department

Davide Antonio Della Polla, Pietro Fanelli, Gianluca Tullo, Stefania Gemma, Martina Petrucci, Francesco Franceschi, Ivan Iozzia, Antonio Gasbarrini, Nicola Bonadia, Marcello Covino
article en

Abstract

Background: Early recognition of sepsis-related coagulation derangements may support timely risk stratification in emergency department (ED) patients with suspected infection. Evidence comparing coagulation-oriented scores in unselected “suspected sepsis” populations remains limited, particularly for predicting progression to sepsis, overt thrombotic/hemorrhagic events, and mortality. Methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study including consecutive ED patients evaluated for sepsis, suspected sepsis, or infection (January 2016–December 2024). Patients with overt disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) at admission were excluded. The Sepsis-Induced Coagulopathy (SIC), Japanese Association for Acute Medicine DIC (JAAM-DIC), International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) score, and Endothelial Activation and Stress Index (EASIX; and log2-EASIX) were calculated at admission. Outcomes were progression to confirmed sepsis (Sepsis-3), symptomatic coagulopathy (thrombotic and/or hemorrhagic events), and in-hospital mortality. Discrimination was assessed by ROC analysis (AUC with 95% CI) and clinical utility by decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: Among 11.274 patients without overt DIC, all scores showed moderate discrimination for mortality and sepsis progression. SIC performed best for in-hospital mortality (AUC 0.701, 95% CI 0.692–0.710) and for progression to confirmed sepsis (AUC 0.672, 95% CI 0.663–0.681). Prediction of overt thrombotic/hemorrhagic complications was poor across scores; ISTH yielded the highest (yet modest) AUCs for thrombotic events (0.614, 95% CI 0.604–0.623), hemorrhagic events (0.545, 95% CI 0.535–0.554), and combined coagulopathy (0.605, 95% CI 0.596–0.614). DCA suggested net benefit at low-to-intermediate threshold probabilities, particularly for SIC (and JAAM2) in early decision ranges. In the confirmed sepsis subgroup, discrimination attenuated overall; for combined coagulopathy, SIC showed the highest AUC (0.558, 95% CI 0.518–0.597). Conclusions: In ED patients with suspected sepsis and no overt DIC at presentation, SIC provides the strongest performance for early prognostic stratification (mortality and sepsis progression), whereas none of the evaluated scores reliably predict clinically overt thrombotic or hemorrhagic complications.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(11)
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT), Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic (IT), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.