Development of a loop‐mediated isothermal amplification‐lateral flow dipstick ( <scp>LAMP</scp> ‐ <scp>LFD</scp> ) assay and on‐site rapid detection evaluation for <i>Rodentibacter heylii</i> and <i>Rodentibacter pneumotropicus</i>

Abstract Background Rodentibacter pneumotropicus and Rodentibacter heylii are important exclusion pathogens in specific pathogen‐free (SPF) laboratory animals. However, routine detection methods such as traditional bacterial culture remain labor‐intensive and time‐consuming. The loop‐mediated isothermal amplification‐lateral flow dipstick (LAMP–LFD) assay provides a self‐contained format for nucleic acid testing that combines speed, sensitivity, and specificity while minimizing aerosol contamination, making it well‐suited for point‐of‐need applications. Objectives This study aimed to develop a streamlined, on‐site detection platform capable of rapidly identifying both pathogens with high analytical accuracy, operational simplicity, and suitability for routine laboratory surveillance. Methods A LAMP–LFD system was established for the detection of the two pathogens using primers designed against the conserved 16S–23S rRNA ITS region. The assay's specificity, sensitivity, repeatability, and limit of detection (LoD) were evaluated. Results The assay achieved detection limits of 1 × 10 −4 ng/μL for R. pneumotropicus and 1 × 10 −5 ng/μL for R. heylii , demonstrating significantly higher sensitivity than PCR. No cross‐reactivity was observed with 15 non‐target bacteria. Among 28 infected samples, the method detected 19 positives, compared with 21 by multiplex PCR and 23 by qPCR. In 842 laboratory animal samples, culture‐based, qPCR, and LAMP–LFD detected 2, 41, and 37 positive samples, respectively. The LoDs were 10 2 and 10 1 CFU/mL in fecal samples and 10 1 and 10 0 CFU/mL in throat swab samples for R. pneumotropicus and R. heylii , respectively. Conclusions This method provides an approach for monitoring the health status of laboratory mice by enabling the detection of these two target pathogens.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Animal Models and Experimental Medicine
Published
2026-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ame2.70214
Primary Topic
Microbial infections and disease research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of a loop‐mediated isothermal amplification‐lateral flow dipstick ( LAMP ‐ LFD ) assay and on‐site rapid detection evaluation for Rodentibacter heylii and Rodentibacter pneumotropicus

Fangwei Dai, Lingqun Lu, Jiangtao Du, Xin Wen et al.
Animal Models and Experimental Medicine
Microbial infections and disease research
article

Development of a loop‐mediated isothermal amplification‐lateral flow dipstick ( LAMP ‐ LFD ) assay and on‐site rapid detection evaluation for Rodentibacter heylii and Rodentibacter pneumotropicus

Fangwei Dai, Lingqun Lu, Jiangtao Du, Xin Wen, Yufang Feng, Shasang Zhou, Jing Xing, Zhiyuan Wang, Wei Han, Honggang Guo, Huiqiong Yan, Junhao Tao, Huazhong Ying, Xiaoyin Jin, Jie Fang, Qingming Kong, Yuhan Gan, Sisi Chen
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Rodentibacter pneumotropicus and Rodentibacter heylii are important exclusion pathogens in specific pathogen‐free (SPF) laboratory animals. However, routine detection methods such as traditional bacterial culture remain labor‐intensive and time‐consuming. The loop‐mediated isothermal amplification‐lateral flow dipstick (LAMP–LFD) assay provides a self‐contained format for nucleic acid testing that combines speed, sensitivity, and specificity while minimizing aerosol contamination, making it well‐suited for point‐of‐need applications. Objectives This study aimed to develop a streamlined, on‐site detection platform capable of rapidly identifying both pathogens with high analytical accuracy, operational simplicity, and suitability for routine laboratory surveillance. Methods A LAMP–LFD system was established for the detection of the two pathogens using primers designed against the conserved 16S–23S rRNA ITS region. The assay's specificity, sensitivity, repeatability, and limit of detection (LoD) were evaluated. Results The assay achieved detection limits of 1 × 10 −4 ng/μL for R. pneumotropicus and 1 × 10 −5 ng/μL for R. heylii , demonstrating significantly higher sensitivity than PCR. No cross‐reactivity was observed with 15 non‐target bacteria. Among 28 infected samples, the method detected 19 positives, compared with 21 by multiplex PCR and 23 by qPCR. In 842 laboratory animal samples, culture‐based, qPCR, and LAMP–LFD detected 2, 41, and 37 positive samples, respectively. The LoDs were 10 2 and 10 1 CFU/mL in fecal samples and 10 1 and 10 0 CFU/mL in throat swab samples for R. pneumotropicus and R. heylii , respectively. Conclusions This method provides an approach for monitoring the health status of laboratory mice by enabling the detection of these two target pathogens.

Animal Models and Experimental Medicine
Chengdu Fifth People's Hospital (CN), National Institutes for Food and Drug Control (CN), Hangzhou Medical College (CN)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Microbial infections and disease research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.