Impact of Allostatic Load on Overall Survival in Patients With Endometrial Cancer

ABSTRACT Introduction Endometrial cancer (EC) mortality is rising, with increasing rates of advanced disease and high‐risk histologic subtypes. Allostatic load (AL), a biomarker of cumulative physiologic stress, has been linked to cancer‐associated outcomes. We evaluated the association between baseline AL and overall survival among patients with EC. Methods Patients diagnosed with EC at a single academic center were retrospectively identified. Baseline demographic, clinical, and laboratory values were used to calculate the primary exposure of interest, AL, based on ten physiologic biomarkers. A cohort‐defined threshold classified patients as having high versus low AL. Data were analyzed using unadjusted and adjusted models and Kaplan–Meier curves. Results A total of 2174 patients (mean age = 63.1 years, SD = 11.2) with EC were assessed for allostatic load at baseline, 69.2% met criteria for high AL ( n = 1505). The median follow up time was 49.5 months (IQR = 25.7, 76.4). High AL was associated with worse overall survival (unadjusted HR: 1.70 (95% CI, 1.28, 2.24), adjusted HR 1.58; 95% CI, 1.19, 2.11). Patients with high AL had a 52% higher rate of death compared to the low AL group. High AL was more prevalent among Black patients, those who were not married, and those without private insurance (all p < 0.001). Conclusions Elevated allostatic load was associated with worse overall survival in this cohort of patients with EC, consistent with the hypothesis that physiological stress may impact survival outcomes. These findings are hypothesis‐generating and suggest that physiologic stress and social disadvantage may contribute to survival differences warranting further study.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Medicine
Published
2026-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.71993
Primary Topic
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Allostatic Load on Overall Survival in Patients With Endometrial Cancer

V. Bae-Jump, Alexandra Diggs, Nikita Sinha, Olivia Lara et al.
Cancer Medicine
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
article

Impact of Allostatic Load on Overall Survival in Patients With Endometrial Cancer

V. Bae-Jump, Alexandra Diggs, Nikita Sinha, Olivia Lara, Vanessa Miller, Emily Broaddus
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction Endometrial cancer (EC) mortality is rising, with increasing rates of advanced disease and high‐risk histologic subtypes. Allostatic load (AL), a biomarker of cumulative physiologic stress, has been linked to cancer‐associated outcomes. We evaluated the association between baseline AL and overall survival among patients with EC. Methods Patients diagnosed with EC at a single academic center were retrospectively identified. Baseline demographic, clinical, and laboratory values were used to calculate the primary exposure of interest, AL, based on ten physiologic biomarkers. A cohort‐defined threshold classified patients as having high versus low AL. Data were analyzed using unadjusted and adjusted models and Kaplan–Meier curves. Results A total of 2174 patients (mean age = 63.1 years, SD = 11.2) with EC were assessed for allostatic load at baseline, 69.2% met criteria for high AL ( n = 1505). The median follow up time was 49.5 months (IQR = 25.7, 76.4). High AL was associated with worse overall survival (unadjusted HR: 1.70 (95% CI, 1.28, 2.24), adjusted HR 1.58; 95% CI, 1.19, 2.11). Patients with high AL had a 52% higher rate of death compared to the low AL group. High AL was more prevalent among Black patients, those who were not married, and those without private insurance (all p < 0.001). Conclusions Elevated allostatic load was associated with worse overall survival in this cohort of patients with EC, consistent with the hypothesis that physiological stress may impact survival outcomes. These findings are hypothesis‐generating and suggest that physiologic stress and social disadvantage may contribute to survival differences warranting further study.

Cancer MedicineVol. 15(6)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.