It Takes Two to Tango: A Pluralist Account for Building Comprehensive Explanations in Human Evolution

ABSTRACT The evolutionary study of human dispersal is a key topic in biological anthropology. However, recent research has revealed inconsistencies between molecular and anatomical data across different timescales and geographic regions. Despite increased interdisciplinary dialogue, these discordances are rarely analyzed in depth or interpreted for their biological significance. We present two case studies: human diversification in Southeast Asia and the Americas, which highlight persistent conflicts between morphological and genetic interpretations. Drawing on recent calls for extending the conceptual tools of evolutionary theory, we argue for a pluralist explanatory framework that can account for developmental plasticity, environmental responsiveness, and multiple trajectories of inheritance. We show how treating different datasets as epistemically equal—rather than subordinating anatomical data to molecular “controls”—allows for more comprehensive and nuanced explanations of evolutionary phenomena. This approach not only offers new insights into past human variation but also addresses long‐standing issues of disciplinary fragmentation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Anthropologist
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/aman.70090
Primary Topic
Race, Genetics, and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

It Takes Two to Tango: A Pluralist Account for Building Comprehensive Explanations in Human Evolution

Lumila Paula Menéndez, Sophie Veigl
American Anthropologist
Race, Genetics, and Society
article

It Takes Two to Tango: A Pluralist Account for Building Comprehensive Explanations in Human Evolution

Lumila Paula Menéndez, Sophie Veigl
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The evolutionary study of human dispersal is a key topic in biological anthropology. However, recent research has revealed inconsistencies between molecular and anatomical data across different timescales and geographic regions. Despite increased interdisciplinary dialogue, these discordances are rarely analyzed in depth or interpreted for their biological significance. We present two case studies: human diversification in Southeast Asia and the Americas, which highlight persistent conflicts between morphological and genetic interpretations. Drawing on recent calls for extending the conceptual tools of evolutionary theory, we argue for a pluralist explanatory framework that can account for developmental plasticity, environmental responsiveness, and multiple trajectories of inheritance. We show how treating different datasets as epistemically equal—rather than subordinating anatomical data to molecular “controls”—allows for more comprehensive and nuanced explanations of evolutionary phenomena. This approach not only offers new insights into past human variation but also addresses long‐standing issues of disciplinary fragmentation.

American Anthropologist
University of Vienna (AT), University of Bonn (DE), Institute of Human Sciences (AT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Race, Genetics, and Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.