The reinforcing effect of anti-caries treatments on acidic challenge resistance of irradiated enamel

AIM: To investigate the effect of applying the following anticaries treatments on the surface microhardness (SMH) of irradiated enamel after pH-cycling: Nanohydroxyapatite (nano-HA), resin infiltration (RI), combination of nano-HA and RI, or curcumin-loaded mesoporous nano-silica (Cur/MSN). METHODOLOGY: In this in vitro experimental study, 30 sound molars were mesiodistally sectioned into two halves, yielding 60 enamel samples, and randomly divided into six groups (n = 10). Group 1 was kept as non-irradiated. The samples from the other five groups were subjected to fractionated X-ray radiation for 6 weeks, with a total dose of 60 Gy, delivered in 2 Gy fractions 5 days per week. After irradiation, each group was processed as follows: 2) no treatment; 3) treated with 15% nano-HA; 4) treated with RI; 5) treated with a combination of 15% nano-HA and RI; 6) treated with Cur/MSN (3 mg/ml). The initial SMH (SMH0) was measured after irradiation and the final (SMH1) after anticaries treatments and pH cycling. pH cycling consisted of a 3-hour immersion in a demineralizing solution, followed by 21 hours in a remineralization solution at 37 °C for 5 days. The surface micromorphology of irradiated groups after pH-cycling was assessed. RESULTS: Mean [±SD] SMH0 of irradiated enamel was significantly lower than that of the non-irradiated one (330.7 ± 23.6 vs 262.9 ± 28.8; P < 0.001). Irradiated enamels treated with all anti-caries treatments showed a significantly higher SMH1 compared to those of no-treatment (192.2 ± 28.7; all P < 0.01). SMH1 of Ir/nano-HA (302.2 ± 16.4) or Ir/nano-HA + RI (305.4 ± 22.1) groups were higher than those of Ir/RI (245.5 ± 35.1; P < 0.001) and not different from Ir/Cur/MSN group (285.9 ± 16.4; P = 0.638 and 0.435 respectively). The increase in SMH1 compared to SMH0 (ΔSMH) was significant only in Ir/nano-HA (39.0; P = 0.003) and Ir/nano-HA + RI groups (42.9; P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Treatment with nano-HA and a combination of nano-HA with RI demonstrated significant potential to improve the resistance of the irradiated enamel surface to acidic challenges.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0350046
Primary Topic
Oral health in cancer treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The reinforcing effect of anti-caries treatments on acidic challenge resistance of irradiated enamel

Fereshteh Shafıei, Esmaeil Mirzaei, Iman Khaleghi, Mansour Ansari et al.
PLoS ONE
Oral health in cancer treatment
article

The reinforcing effect of anti-caries treatments on acidic challenge resistance of irradiated enamel

Fereshteh Shafıei, Esmaeil Mirzaei, Iman Khaleghi, Mansour Ansari, Maryam S. Tavangar
article en

Abstract

AIM: To investigate the effect of applying the following anticaries treatments on the surface microhardness (SMH) of irradiated enamel after pH-cycling: Nanohydroxyapatite (nano-HA), resin infiltration (RI), combination of nano-HA and RI, or curcumin-loaded mesoporous nano-silica (Cur/MSN). METHODOLOGY: In this in vitro experimental study, 30 sound molars were mesiodistally sectioned into two halves, yielding 60 enamel samples, and randomly divided into six groups (n = 10). Group 1 was kept as non-irradiated. The samples from the other five groups were subjected to fractionated X-ray radiation for 6 weeks, with a total dose of 60 Gy, delivered in 2 Gy fractions 5 days per week. After irradiation, each group was processed as follows: 2) no treatment; 3) treated with 15% nano-HA; 4) treated with RI; 5) treated with a combination of 15% nano-HA and RI; 6) treated with Cur/MSN (3 mg/ml). The initial SMH (SMH0) was measured after irradiation and the final (SMH1) after anticaries treatments and pH cycling. pH cycling consisted of a 3-hour immersion in a demineralizing solution, followed by 21 hours in a remineralization solution at 37 °C for 5 days. The surface micromorphology of irradiated groups after pH-cycling was assessed. RESULTS: Mean [±SD] SMH0 of irradiated enamel was significantly lower than that of the non-irradiated one (330.7 ± 23.6 vs 262.9 ± 28.8; P < 0.001). Irradiated enamels treated with all anti-caries treatments showed a significantly higher SMH1 compared to those of no-treatment (192.2 ± 28.7; all P < 0.01). SMH1 of Ir/nano-HA (302.2 ± 16.4) or Ir/nano-HA + RI (305.4 ± 22.1) groups were higher than those of Ir/RI (245.5 ± 35.1; P < 0.001) and not different from Ir/Cur/MSN group (285.9 ± 16.4; P = 0.638 and 0.435 respectively). The increase in SMH1 compared to SMH0 (ΔSMH) was significant only in Ir/nano-HA (39.0; P = 0.003) and Ir/nano-HA + RI groups (42.9; P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Treatment with nano-HA and a combination of nano-HA with RI demonstrated significant potential to improve the resistance of the irradiated enamel surface to acidic challenges.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(5)
Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (IR), Lorestan University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Oral health in cancer treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.