Accuracy of the Digital Terrain Model and Its Impact on the Results of Hydraulic Modelling in Floodplains

The most important input for modelling the water flow in an inundation area is the Digital Terrain Model (DTM). The significance of DTM accuracy increases with activities related to the re-opening of floodplains to rivers, according to the Biodiversity Strategy 2030 issued by the European Committee in 2022. In this study, three Digital Terrain Models were compared: two DTMs (fourth and fifth versions) generated as Czech standards by the State Administration of Land Surveying and Cadastre, and a purpose-built DTM created by the CzechGlobe institute, CAS. A series of hydraulic calculations were carried out combining the three DTMs with the set of discharges corresponding to return periods of 1, 5, 20, and 100 years. The “typical” inundation area on the right bank of the Morava River was chosen to compare the modelling results. DTM inaccuracy affected the hydraulic modelling results primarily when smaller discharges passed the inundation area, mostly due to DTM inaccuracies in local open channels and water-collecting ditches, which are poorly and erroneously depicted when using the less-accurate fourth- and fifth-version DTMs. This study also shows that there was no direct correlation between the locations of DTM inaccuracies and differences in water levels obtained via hydraulic modelling, which dropped with increasing flood discharge. The error in the calculated water level exceeded approximately 0.75 m for Q1 and approximately 0.33 m for Q100. The error depends on the morphology and segmentation of the floodplain, the configuration of the hydraulic model, local changes and human interventions in the area, and the type of DTM, the technology used, and its accuracy and resolution. This study contributes to assessment of the accuracy of hydraulic modelling in flood inundation areas and indicates how DTM accuracy affects hydraulic modelling outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Water
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/w18111312
Primary Topic
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Accuracy of the Digital Terrain Model and Its Impact on the Results of Hydraulic Modelling in Floodplains

Miroslav Pikl, Tomáš Julínek, František Zemek, Jaromír Říha et al.
Water
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
article

Accuracy of the Digital Terrain Model and Its Impact on the Results of Hydraulic Modelling in Floodplains

Miroslav Pikl, Tomáš Julínek, František Zemek, Jaromír Říha, David Duchan, Jiří Skokan, Iva Jelínková
article en

Abstract

The most important input for modelling the water flow in an inundation area is the Digital Terrain Model (DTM). The significance of DTM accuracy increases with activities related to the re-opening of floodplains to rivers, according to the Biodiversity Strategy 2030 issued by the European Committee in 2022. In this study, three Digital Terrain Models were compared: two DTMs (fourth and fifth versions) generated as Czech standards by the State Administration of Land Surveying and Cadastre, and a purpose-built DTM created by the CzechGlobe institute, CAS. A series of hydraulic calculations were carried out combining the three DTMs with the set of discharges corresponding to return periods of 1, 5, 20, and 100 years. The “typical” inundation area on the right bank of the Morava River was chosen to compare the modelling results. DTM inaccuracy affected the hydraulic modelling results primarily when smaller discharges passed the inundation area, mostly due to DTM inaccuracies in local open channels and water-collecting ditches, which are poorly and erroneously depicted when using the less-accurate fourth- and fifth-version DTMs. This study also shows that there was no direct correlation between the locations of DTM inaccuracies and differences in water levels obtained via hydraulic modelling, which dropped with increasing flood discharge. The error in the calculated water level exceeded approximately 0.75 m for Q1 and approximately 0.33 m for Q100. The error depends on the morphology and segmentation of the floodplain, the configuration of the hydraulic model, local changes and human interventions in the area, and the type of DTM, the technology used, and its accuracy and resolution. This study contributes to assessment of the accuracy of hydraulic modelling in flood inundation areas and indicates how DTM accuracy affects hydraulic modelling outcomes.

WaterVol. 18(11)
Czech Academy of Sciences, Global Change Research Institute (CZ), Litani River Authority (LB), Brno University of Technology (CZ)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.