Intersectoral interventions for people living with obesity: a scoping review and bibliometric analysis

Abstract Background Obesity is increasingly recognized as a complex chronic condition shaped by genetic, behavioural, social, and environmental factors. While intersectoral collaboration is considered essential to address these multifaceted drivers, few studies have systematically explored the nature and implementation of such interventions, particularly outside the clinical domain. Objective This study aimed to identify and characterize intersectoral health interventions targeting people living with obesity within community and primary care settings, drawing from both scientific and grey literature. Methods Following Arksey and O’Malley’s framework, we conducted a scoping review searching across three academic databases (MEDLINE, Web of Science, and CINAHL) and multiple grey literature sources. Inclusion criteria focused on intersectoral interventions developed from 2006 to 2025, targeting adults living with obesity in high-income countries. Data extraction was guided by a concept map of determinants of health (DoH) developed in collaboration with patient-partners. A bibliometric analysis of included studies was also conducted using the VOSviewer ® software. Results Among 23 included records (20 peer-reviewed and 3 grey literature), most interventions originated from the United States and focused on lifestyle modification. While none explicitly defined “intersectorality,” collaborations typically involved healthcare, academic, community, and faith-based organizations. Community health workers emerged as central actors linking clinical and social domains. Interventions often targeted minority populations and emphasized cultural relevance. However, outcome measures remained largely biomedical, with limited integration of DoH indicators. Conclusion Intersectoral interventions for people living with obesity remain under-conceptualized, despite growing implementation. To foster equity and person-centered care, future efforts must embed DoH into evaluation frameworks, support community health workers as structural agents of integration, and formalize intersectoral governance. Co-designed approaches grounded in community realities offer promising pathways for sustainable and inclusive obesity management strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Public Health
Published
2026-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-026-27953-6
Primary Topic
Obesity and Health Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intersectoral interventions for people living with obesity: a scoping review and bibliometric analysis

Jean‐Baptiste Gartner, Nadia Sourial, Lily Lessard, Géraldine Layani et al.
BMC Public Health
Obesity and Health Practices
article

Intersectoral interventions for people living with obesity: a scoping review and bibliometric analysis

Jean‐Baptiste Gartner, Nadia Sourial, Lily Lessard, Géraldine Layani, Maxime Sasseville, Frédéric Bergeron, Antoine Boivin, Sopie Marielle Yapi, Brigitte Vachon, Laurence Berthelet, Thameya Balasingam, Blandine Lentilhac, Anne Schweitzer, Audrey L’Espérance, André Coté
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Obesity is increasingly recognized as a complex chronic condition shaped by genetic, behavioural, social, and environmental factors. While intersectoral collaboration is considered essential to address these multifaceted drivers, few studies have systematically explored the nature and implementation of such interventions, particularly outside the clinical domain. Objective This study aimed to identify and characterize intersectoral health interventions targeting people living with obesity within community and primary care settings, drawing from both scientific and grey literature. Methods Following Arksey and O’Malley’s framework, we conducted a scoping review searching across three academic databases (MEDLINE, Web of Science, and CINAHL) and multiple grey literature sources. Inclusion criteria focused on intersectoral interventions developed from 2006 to 2025, targeting adults living with obesity in high-income countries. Data extraction was guided by a concept map of determinants of health (DoH) developed in collaboration with patient-partners. A bibliometric analysis of included studies was also conducted using the VOSviewer ® software. Results Among 23 included records (20 peer-reviewed and 3 grey literature), most interventions originated from the United States and focused on lifestyle modification. While none explicitly defined “intersectorality,” collaborations typically involved healthcare, academic, community, and faith-based organizations. Community health workers emerged as central actors linking clinical and social domains. Interventions often targeted minority populations and emphasized cultural relevance. However, outcome measures remained largely biomedical, with limited integration of DoH indicators. Conclusion Intersectoral interventions for people living with obesity remain under-conceptualized, despite growing implementation. To foster equity and person-centered care, future efforts must embed DoH into evaluation frameworks, support community health workers as structural agents of integration, and formalize intersectoral governance. Co-designed approaches grounded in community realities offer promising pathways for sustainable and inclusive obesity management strategies.

BMC Public Health
Université du Québec à Rimouski (CA), École Nationale d'Administration Publique (CA), Université du Québec en Outaouais (CA), Institut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de Québec (CA), Centre Intégré de Santé et Services Sociaux de Chaudière-Appalache (CA), Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal (CA), Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec (CA), Université Laval (CA), Université de Montréal (CA)
Fonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Obesity and Health Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.