Testing the empirical validity of the work preference labor supply model: evidence from a guaranteed income program for artists in New York State

Abstract This study investigates the impact of the Creatives Rebuild New York (CRNY) Guaranteed Income for Artists (GIA) program on labor supply and earnings among New York State artists. The program provided 2400 artists with $1000 monthly, unconditional payments for 18 months to address financial instability and promote artistic practices. Using a matched comparison of participant and control group data, the analysis reveals that guaranteed income increased time spent on arts work by 3.9 h weekly while reducing non-arts work by 2.4 h. Although participation in arts-work grew, earnings from both arts and non-arts sectors declined, indicating a shift in financial reliance enabled by guaranteed income. The findings help validate Throsby (1994) work-preference model, emphasizing the intrinsic value of artistic labor over monetary incentives, especially nonlabor income.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cultural Economics
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10824-026-09594-0
Primary Topic
Cultural Industries and Urban Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Testing the empirical validity of the work preference labor supply model: evidence from a guaranteed income program for artists in New York State

Joanna Woronkowicz, Douglas S Noonan
Journal of Cultural Economics
Cultural Industries and Urban Development
article

Testing the empirical validity of the work preference labor supply model: evidence from a guaranteed income program for artists in New York State

Joanna Woronkowicz, Douglas S Noonan
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study investigates the impact of the Creatives Rebuild New York (CRNY) Guaranteed Income for Artists (GIA) program on labor supply and earnings among New York State artists. The program provided 2400 artists with $1000 monthly, unconditional payments for 18 months to address financial instability and promote artistic practices. Using a matched comparison of participant and control group data, the analysis reveals that guaranteed income increased time spent on arts work by 3.9 h weekly while reducing non-arts work by 2.4 h. Although participation in arts-work grew, earnings from both arts and non-arts sectors declined, indicating a shift in financial reliance enabled by guaranteed income. The findings help validate Throsby (1994) work-preference model, emphasizing the intrinsic value of artistic labor over monetary incentives, especially nonlabor income.

Journal of Cultural Economics
Indiana University Bloomington (US), Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US)
Tides Foundation
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Cultural Industries and Urban Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.