Replacing animal models in microsurgical training: A review and future perspectives on engineered synthetic blood vessels

OBJECTIVE: Microsurgical training requires high-fidelity vascular models to replace traditional training on living animals or cadavers, which face increasing ethical and logistical constraints. This review evaluates the current state of engineered synthetic blood vessel models designed to accurately mimic the mechanical and haptic properties of human vessels.
Methods. Following a systematic literature search, data were extracted and analyzed from 26 primary studies. The models were categorized into three primary technological groups: 3D-printed/post-processed structures, spinning technologies, and biomimetic/hybrid grafts. Key mechanical benchmarks, including burst pressure and suture retention force, were compared against human physiological references.
Results. The analysis indicates that while silicone and elastomers provide excellent durability and geometric precision, hydrogel-based and multi-layered hybrid models offer superior "needle-feel" and biomimetic compliance. Mechanical validation remains heterogeneous across the 26 studies. However, burst pressure and suture retention are emerging as critical benchmarks for assessing model fidelity.
Conclusion. Future developments should focus on standardized, multi-material models that integrate pulsatile flow systems. Such advancements are essential to bridge the gap between benchtop simulation and clinical reality, ultimately facilitating the replacement of animal models in microsurgical education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biomedical Materials
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-605x/ae7522
Primary Topic
Anatomy and Medical Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Replacing animal models in microsurgical training: A review and future perspectives on engineered synthetic blood vessels

Simon Kratzer, Deepak M. Kalaskar, Sushma Priya, Leo Saturnino
Biomedical Materials
Anatomy and Medical Technology
article

Replacing animal models in microsurgical training: A review and future perspectives on engineered synthetic blood vessels

Simon Kratzer, Deepak M. Kalaskar, Sushma Priya, Leo Saturnino
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Microsurgical training requires high-fidelity vascular models to replace traditional training on living animals or cadavers, which face increasing ethical and logistical constraints. This review evaluates the current state of engineered synthetic blood vessel models designed to accurately mimic the mechanical and haptic properties of human vessels.
Methods. Following a systematic literature search, data were extracted and analyzed from 26 primary studies. The models were categorized into three primary technological groups: 3D-printed/post-processed structures, spinning technologies, and biomimetic/hybrid grafts. Key mechanical benchmarks, including burst pressure and suture retention force, were compared against human physiological references.
Results. The analysis indicates that while silicone and elastomers provide excellent durability and geometric precision, hydrogel-based and multi-layered hybrid models offer superior "needle-feel" and biomimetic compliance. Mechanical validation remains heterogeneous across the 26 studies. However, burst pressure and suture retention are emerging as critical benchmarks for assessing model fidelity.
Conclusion. Future developments should focus on standardized, multi-material models that integrate pulsatile flow systems. Such advancements are essential to bridge the gap between benchtop simulation and clinical reality, ultimately facilitating the replacement of animal models in microsurgical education.

Biomedical Materials
Griffin Hospital (US), University College London (GB)
Humane Research Trust, National Centre for the Replacement Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Anatomy and Medical Technology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.