Efficacy of AI-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy interventions for anxiety and depressive symptoms: a systematic review

Despite the availability of evidence-based treatments like CBT, many individuals still lack adequate care for anxiety and depression due to workforce shortages, systemic barriers, and cultural differences. AI-delivered CBT (AI CBT) offers a scalable solution to this issue, yet existing evidence remains fragmented and lacks diversity. This systematic review addresses this gap regarding AI CBTs. We searched Web of Science, PubMed, and PsycINFO for RCTs 2016 onward that evaluated AI CBT for anxiety or depressive symptoms. Of 208 studies screened, 16 met the inclusion criteria. Data was extracted and thematically synthesized. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2. AI CBT showed limited efficacy for anxiety, with only 1 of 14 studies reporting significant improvements. Third-wave CBT and interventions targeting younger populations may show particular potential in reducing anxiety. For depressive symptoms, only 4 of 16 studies showed significant improvements. Across both conditions, highly preliminary evidence suggest that AI CBTs show less promise for older adults. Additionally, personalization and human support appeared to not be reliably associated with improved outcomes. Study quality also raised concerns. Overall, current AI CBTs require further refinement through high-quality and user-centered research. No funding went into this manuscript (PROSPERO: CRD42024615340).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Digital Medicine
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-026-02744-w
Primary Topic
Digital Mental Health Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy of AI-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy interventions for anxiety and depressive symptoms: a systematic review

David Stückler, Ya Yang, Zi Wang, Wing Lam Tiffany Yip
npj Digital Medicine
Digital Mental Health Interventions
article

Efficacy of AI-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy interventions for anxiety and depressive symptoms: a systematic review

David Stückler, Ya Yang, Zi Wang, Wing Lam Tiffany Yip
article en

Abstract

Despite the availability of evidence-based treatments like CBT, many individuals still lack adequate care for anxiety and depression due to workforce shortages, systemic barriers, and cultural differences. AI-delivered CBT (AI CBT) offers a scalable solution to this issue, yet existing evidence remains fragmented and lacks diversity. This systematic review addresses this gap regarding AI CBTs. We searched Web of Science, PubMed, and PsycINFO for RCTs 2016 onward that evaluated AI CBT for anxiety or depressive symptoms. Of 208 studies screened, 16 met the inclusion criteria. Data was extracted and thematically synthesized. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2. AI CBT showed limited efficacy for anxiety, with only 1 of 14 studies reporting significant improvements. Third-wave CBT and interventions targeting younger populations may show particular potential in reducing anxiety. For depressive symptoms, only 4 of 16 studies showed significant improvements. Across both conditions, highly preliminary evidence suggest that AI CBTs show less promise for older adults. Additionally, personalization and human support appeared to not be reliably associated with improved outcomes. Study quality also raised concerns. Overall, current AI CBTs require further refinement through high-quality and user-centered research. No funding went into this manuscript (PROSPERO: CRD42024615340).

npj Digital Medicine
University of Oxford (GB), Department of Public Health (US), Bocconi University (IT), University of California, Davis (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Digital Mental Health Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.