A tool worth keeping : efficiency and multifunctionality in great ape tool use

This dissertation includes three studies with wild and captive non-human apes to explore the structure and scope of great ape tool representation. In the first study, I test whether captive orangutans can combine two separately learned tool functions into a multifunctional tool-use sequence. The results suggest that combining tool functions is highly challenging for a test-experienced orangutan (Pongo abelii) even after mastering each sub-action. For the second study, I tested captive chimpanzees’ tool choice under uncertain task demands. Most captive chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) learned to choose multifunctional tools when they were unsure which task would be presented, but they also generalised this preference to open trials where single-function tools would have been more efficient. My third chapter targets tool transport behaviour while nut gathering in wild nutcracking chimpanzees. My analysis suggests that wild chimpanzees combine social and physical information to make transport decisions: the more adult individuals were nearby, the more likely they were to carry their tool while gathering, but only when they were using medium-sized stone hammers. This preference appears to be driven by cultural factors or a preference for more versatile tool materials, since carrying rates for wooden hammers were significantly lower despite equal or higher tool efficiency. Both captive and wild apes, therefore, appear ready to develop preferences for more versatile tools and use tools in multifunctional ways, even in the absence of efficiency benefits or clear evidence for multifunctional tool representations.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
St Andrews Research Repository (St Andrews Research Repository)
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17630/sta/1662
Primary Topic
Primate Behavior and Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A tool worth keeping : efficiency and multifunctionality in great ape tool use

Tina Petersen
St Andrews Research Repository (St Andrews Research Repository)
Primate Behavior and Ecology
article

A tool worth keeping : efficiency and multifunctionality in great ape tool use

Tina Petersen
article en

Abstract

This dissertation includes three studies with wild and captive non-human apes to explore the structure and scope of great ape tool representation. In the first study, I test whether captive orangutans can combine two separately learned tool functions into a multifunctional tool-use sequence. The results suggest that combining tool functions is highly challenging for a test-experienced orangutan (Pongo abelii) even after mastering each sub-action. For the second study, I tested captive chimpanzees’ tool choice under uncertain task demands. Most captive chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) learned to choose multifunctional tools when they were unsure which task would be presented, but they also generalised this preference to open trials where single-function tools would have been more efficient. My third chapter targets tool transport behaviour while nut gathering in wild nutcracking chimpanzees. My analysis suggests that wild chimpanzees combine social and physical information to make transport decisions: the more adult individuals were nearby, the more likely they were to carry their tool while gathering, but only when they were using medium-sized stone hammers. This preference appears to be driven by cultural factors or a preference for more versatile tool materials, since carrying rates for wooden hammers were significantly lower despite equal or higher tool efficiency. Both captive and wild apes, therefore, appear ready to develop preferences for more versatile tools and use tools in multifunctional ways, even in the absence of efficiency benefits or clear evidence for multifunctional tool representations.

St Andrews Research Repository (St Andrews Research Repository)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Primate Behavior and Ecology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.