Developing capabilities for resilient process automation: A strategic information systems framework

Organizations adopt process automation software to support digital transformation, but leaders managing diverse Information Systems (IS) face challenges in developing automation capabilities that deliver both strategic advantage and operational resilience. This study examines how organizations build and sustain process automation competencies through effective Information Technology (IT) governance, strategic alignment, and systematic capability development. Drawing on Technology-to-Performance Chain (TPC) theory and the Dynamic Capabilities framework, this research analyses IS management practices to demonstrate how process automation initiatives can evolve from tactical implementations into sustainable and resilient sources of competitive advantage. A multi-method research design was employed, combining survey data from 286 IT and business leaders across manufacturing, retail, logistics, financial services, and healthcare organizations in the Nordic region, together with 18 qualitative interviews with Chief Information Officers (CIOs), IT directors, and automation leaders. The study identifies pathways for developing three critical capability dimensions: (1) technical capabilities through platform selection and integration practices, (2) governance capabilities through portfolio management and performance measurement mechanisms, and (3) organisational capabilities through change management and continuous learning. The analysis shows that governance capabilities explain 61% of return on investment variance, while balanced capability development across all three dimensions produces returns 2.5 times higher than single-dimension focus. Organizations with mature capabilities establish governance before scaling these initiatives, adopt hybrid governance models, and invest approximately 35% in governance, 35% in technical, and 30% in organisational capabilities. The study provides a capability development framework, empirical evidence of development and performance outcomes, as well as practical guidance for building automation capabilities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Knowledge-based and Intelligent Engineering Systems
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13272314251410348
Primary Topic
Robotic Process Automation Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Developing capabilities for resilient process automation: A strategic information systems framework

Damian Kedziora
International Journal of Knowledge-based and Intelligent Engineering Systems
Robotic Process Automation Applications
article

Developing capabilities for resilient process automation: A strategic information systems framework

Damian Kedziora
article en

Abstract

Organizations adopt process automation software to support digital transformation, but leaders managing diverse Information Systems (IS) face challenges in developing automation capabilities that deliver both strategic advantage and operational resilience. This study examines how organizations build and sustain process automation competencies through effective Information Technology (IT) governance, strategic alignment, and systematic capability development. Drawing on Technology-to-Performance Chain (TPC) theory and the Dynamic Capabilities framework, this research analyses IS management practices to demonstrate how process automation initiatives can evolve from tactical implementations into sustainable and resilient sources of competitive advantage. A multi-method research design was employed, combining survey data from 286 IT and business leaders across manufacturing, retail, logistics, financial services, and healthcare organizations in the Nordic region, together with 18 qualitative interviews with Chief Information Officers (CIOs), IT directors, and automation leaders. The study identifies pathways for developing three critical capability dimensions: (1) technical capabilities through platform selection and integration practices, (2) governance capabilities through portfolio management and performance measurement mechanisms, and (3) organisational capabilities through change management and continuous learning. The analysis shows that governance capabilities explain 61% of return on investment variance, while balanced capability development across all three dimensions produces returns 2.5 times higher than single-dimension focus. Organizations with mature capabilities establish governance before scaling these initiatives, adopt hybrid governance models, and invest approximately 35% in governance, 35% in technical, and 30% in organisational capabilities. The study provides a capability development framework, empirical evidence of development and performance outcomes, as well as practical guidance for building automation capabilities.

International Journal of Knowledge-based and Intelligent Engineering Systems
Kozminski University (PL), Software Engineering Institute (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Robotic Process Automation Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.