Contrast‐Associated Acute Kidney Injury: Balancing Kidney Risk and Access to Essential Imaging

ABSTRACT Iodinated contrast media are central to modern medicine, but have historically been associated with contrast‐induced nephropathy (CIN), prompting widespread caution when imaging patients with kidney disease. This has led to delays, precautionary measures and avoidance of clinically indicated imaging. Contemporary evidence suggests that the risk of clinically meaningful kidney injury attributable to modern contrast agents has been overstated. We conducted a structured narrative review of the literature examining iodinated contrast media and kidney injury. Searches of PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus and Google Scholar were performed in January 2026. Evidence was synthesised to evaluate the incidence, pathogenesis, clinical outcomes and prevention of contrast‐associated acute kidney injury. Early reports of CIN were largely based on uncontrolled observational studies that attributed post‐contrast creatinine rises to nephrotoxicity without appropriate comparator groups. Contemporary controlled studies demonstrate no independent association between intravenous contrast and clinically meaningful outcomes such as dialysis, chronic kidney disease progression or mortality. Experimental models show plausible mechanisms of injury but often rely on conditions not representative of routine practice. Biomarker studies highlight discordance between functional and structural kidney injury. Preventive strategies, including prophylactic hydration, have not demonstrated benefit in high‐quality trials. Overall, clinically significant kidney injury attributable to modern iodinated contrast media appears uncommon. Excessive caution may delay or prevent necessary diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. A balanced, evidence‐based approach prioritising timely imaging while addressing modifiable risk factors may improve patient outcomes and reduce barriers to care. The evidence synthesised in this review informs updated national guidance on contrast use in Aotearoa New Zealand.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nephrology
Published
2026-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/nep.70233
Primary Topic
Acute Kidney Injury Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Contrast‐Associated Acute Kidney Injury: Balancing Kidney Risk and Access to Essential Imaging

Rob Walker, Kody Shaw, Grace Chia
Nephrology
Acute Kidney Injury Research
article

Contrast‐Associated Acute Kidney Injury: Balancing Kidney Risk and Access to Essential Imaging

Rob Walker, Kody Shaw, Grace Chia
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Iodinated contrast media are central to modern medicine, but have historically been associated with contrast‐induced nephropathy (CIN), prompting widespread caution when imaging patients with kidney disease. This has led to delays, precautionary measures and avoidance of clinically indicated imaging. Contemporary evidence suggests that the risk of clinically meaningful kidney injury attributable to modern contrast agents has been overstated. We conducted a structured narrative review of the literature examining iodinated contrast media and kidney injury. Searches of PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus and Google Scholar were performed in January 2026. Evidence was synthesised to evaluate the incidence, pathogenesis, clinical outcomes and prevention of contrast‐associated acute kidney injury. Early reports of CIN were largely based on uncontrolled observational studies that attributed post‐contrast creatinine rises to nephrotoxicity without appropriate comparator groups. Contemporary controlled studies demonstrate no independent association between intravenous contrast and clinically meaningful outcomes such as dialysis, chronic kidney disease progression or mortality. Experimental models show plausible mechanisms of injury but often rely on conditions not representative of routine practice. Biomarker studies highlight discordance between functional and structural kidney injury. Preventive strategies, including prophylactic hydration, have not demonstrated benefit in high‐quality trials. Overall, clinically significant kidney injury attributable to modern iodinated contrast media appears uncommon. Excessive caution may delay or prevent necessary diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. A balanced, evidence‐based approach prioritising timely imaging while addressing modifiable risk factors may improve patient outcomes and reduce barriers to care. The evidence synthesised in this review informs updated national guidance on contrast use in Aotearoa New Zealand.

NephrologyVol. 31(6)
University of Canterbury (NZ), Environment Canterbury (NZ), Capital and Coast District Health Board (NZ), University of Otago (NZ)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Acute Kidney Injury Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.