Effects of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in Autistic Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background: Autism is a neurodevelopmental disability characterized by differences in communication, social interaction, and behavior. Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is a promising intervention for autistic people, yet research mainly focuses on children. Objective: To assess the effects of CBT in autistic adults. Methods: We performed a systematic review. We conducted searches in PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating CBT in autistic adults (≥16 years). We performed study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment in duplicate. We conducted meta-analyses using random-effects models. We determined the certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology. Results: We included 10 RCTs ( n = 537). Most RCTs had small sample sizes and a high risk of bias, and most meta-analyses showed heterogeneity. For alexithymia, CBT probably caused an important reduction (1 RCT; MD: −5.30 points; 95% confidence intervals: –10.87 to + 0.27; moderate certainty of the evidence) at less than 6 months post-treatment. Regarding other outcomes at less than 6 months, CBT may reduce depression and anxiety and improve quality of life; however, it may have little to no effect on social anxiety, functioning, obsessive-compulsive symptoms, mental health symptom severity, and all-cause discontinuation. For autistic traits, CBT may lead to an increase in scores. The evidence for these latter outcomes remains very uncertain (very low certainty of the evidence). Conclusion: CBT showed very uncertain effects across most outcomes in autistic adults. CBT probably reduced alexithymia at less than 6 months post-treatment. These findings are limited by methodological issues in the included RCTs, such as small sample sizes and high risk of bias. Overall, evidence on the effect of CBT in autistic adults remains limited, highlighting the need for more rigorous research to inform clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Autism in Adulthood
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/25739581261450541
Primary Topic
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in Autistic Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Jesús Pérez-Castilla, Glauco Valdivieso-Jiménez, Ana Brañez-Condorena, Carlos H. Contreras-Pizarro et al.
Autism in Adulthood
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
article

Effects of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in Autistic Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Jesús Pérez-Castilla, Glauco Valdivieso-Jiménez, Ana Brañez-Condorena, Carlos H. Contreras-Pizarro, Alvaro Taype-Rondan, Andrea Munoz-Figueroa, Adan V. Sifuentes Montalvo
article en

Abstract

Background: Autism is a neurodevelopmental disability characterized by differences in communication, social interaction, and behavior. Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is a promising intervention for autistic people, yet research mainly focuses on children. Objective: To assess the effects of CBT in autistic adults. Methods: We performed a systematic review. We conducted searches in PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating CBT in autistic adults (≥16 years). We performed study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment in duplicate. We conducted meta-analyses using random-effects models. We determined the certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology. Results: We included 10 RCTs ( n = 537). Most RCTs had small sample sizes and a high risk of bias, and most meta-analyses showed heterogeneity. For alexithymia, CBT probably caused an important reduction (1 RCT; MD: −5.30 points; 95% confidence intervals: –10.87 to + 0.27; moderate certainty of the evidence) at less than 6 months post-treatment. Regarding other outcomes at less than 6 months, CBT may reduce depression and anxiety and improve quality of life; however, it may have little to no effect on social anxiety, functioning, obsessive-compulsive symptoms, mental health symptom severity, and all-cause discontinuation. For autistic traits, CBT may lead to an increase in scores. The evidence for these latter outcomes remains very uncertain (very low certainty of the evidence). Conclusion: CBT showed very uncertain effects across most outcomes in autistic adults. CBT probably reduced alexithymia at less than 6 months post-treatment. These findings are limited by methodological issues in the included RCTs, such as small sample sizes and high risk of bias. Overall, evidence on the effect of CBT in autistic adults remains limited, highlighting the need for more rigorous research to inform clinical practice.

Autism in Adulthood
National University of San Marcos (PE), Universidad Científica del Sur (PE), Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola (PE), National University of Saint Anthony the Abbot in Cuzco (PE), EsSALUD (PE), Ministerio de Salud (BO), Institute of Peruvian Studies (PE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.