Conditional Acceptance and the Optimism–Knowledge Gap: A Scoping Review of Attitudes and Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare in Italy

Background/Objectives: Artificial intelligence (AI) is integrated into diagnostic, therapeutic, administrative, and communicative healthcare domains in Italy under regulations requiring human oversight. Empirical evidence on AI attitudes, acceptance, and perceptions in Italian healthcare is rapidly accumulating but not systematically mapped. This scoping review aimed to (i) map empirical evidence on AI attitudes, acceptance, and perceptions in Italy by population and domain; (ii) identify measurement instruments used in studies and their origins; and (iii) characterize determinants, themes, and methodological gaps in the Italian evidence base. Methods: This review used Joanna Briggs Institute methodology, reported via PRISMA-ScR (protocol Open Science Framework doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/TZRVF). PubMed and Embase were searched on 27 April 2026 from January 2018 in English, Italian, or German, combining controlled vocabulary and free-text terms across AI, attitudes-acceptance, and healthcare delivery, with an Italian-context qualifier; a complementary AI-assisted semantic search (Consensus Pro) was conducted to validate retrieval completeness. Eligibility criteria used the Population–Concept–Context mnemonic. Results: Of 1510 unique records screened, 35 empirical studies were retained, comprising 7 studies of Italian patients and the general population, 22 studies of healthcare professionals, 3 psychometric validation studies of AI-acceptance instruments, 1 mixed-population study, and 2 international comparator studies with substantial Italian sub-samples. Acceptance was consistently positive but conditional on physician oversight, training, and regulatory clarity. A recurrent optimism–knowledge gap and an absence of probabilistic, population-representative evidence were identified as principal gaps. Conclusions: Italian evidence on AI attitudes is expanding but methodologically narrow. Three Italian-validated acceptance instruments are now available. Population-representative, multilingual, and longitudinal evidence is required.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medical Sciences
Published
2026-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci14020276
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Conditional Acceptance and the Optimism–Knowledge Gap: A Scoping Review of Attitudes and Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare in Italy

Dietmar Ausserhofer, Giuliano Piccoliori, Christian Josef Wiedermann, Doris Hager von Strobele Prainsack
Medical Sciences
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Conditional Acceptance and the Optimism–Knowledge Gap: A Scoping Review of Attitudes and Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare in Italy

Dietmar Ausserhofer, Giuliano Piccoliori, Christian Josef Wiedermann, Doris Hager von Strobele Prainsack
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Artificial intelligence (AI) is integrated into diagnostic, therapeutic, administrative, and communicative healthcare domains in Italy under regulations requiring human oversight. Empirical evidence on AI attitudes, acceptance, and perceptions in Italian healthcare is rapidly accumulating but not systematically mapped. This scoping review aimed to (i) map empirical evidence on AI attitudes, acceptance, and perceptions in Italy by population and domain; (ii) identify measurement instruments used in studies and their origins; and (iii) characterize determinants, themes, and methodological gaps in the Italian evidence base. Methods: This review used Joanna Briggs Institute methodology, reported via PRISMA-ScR (protocol Open Science Framework doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/TZRVF). PubMed and Embase were searched on 27 April 2026 from January 2018 in English, Italian, or German, combining controlled vocabulary and free-text terms across AI, attitudes-acceptance, and healthcare delivery, with an Italian-context qualifier; a complementary AI-assisted semantic search (Consensus Pro) was conducted to validate retrieval completeness. Eligibility criteria used the Population–Concept–Context mnemonic. Results: Of 1510 unique records screened, 35 empirical studies were retained, comprising 7 studies of Italian patients and the general population, 22 studies of healthcare professionals, 3 psychometric validation studies of AI-acceptance instruments, 1 mixed-population study, and 2 international comparator studies with substantial Italian sub-samples. Acceptance was consistently positive but conditional on physician oversight, training, and regulatory clarity. A recurrent optimism–knowledge gap and an absence of probabilistic, population-representative evidence were identified as principal gaps. Conclusions: Italian evidence on AI attitudes is expanding but methodologically narrow. Three Italian-validated acceptance instruments are now available. Population-representative, multilingual, and longitudinal evidence is required.

Medical SciencesVol. 14(2)
Ospedale di Bolzano (IT), Landesfachhochschule für Gesundheitsberufe Claudiana (IT)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.