Implementation science frameworks for active and sustainable transportation interventions with a focus on equity: A scoping review

Background There is a growing need to promote sustainable transportation in urban environments. Active and sustainable transportation interventions are implemented through a pathway of actors responsible for funding, design, planning, and construction. This scoping review summarizes peer-reviewed literature that uses implementation science theories, models, and/or frameworks for active and sustainable transportation interventions and categorizes the included frameworks using an existing implementation science taxonomy. Barriers and facilitators to implementation are identified, as well as the inclusion of transportation equity considerations in implementation, if present. Methods Six databases were searched from inception to June 4, 2025. Records were screened at title, abstract, and full-text phases by two reviewers independently. Conflicts were resolved by consensus or with a third reviewer. Articles were summarized using thematic analysis and narrative synthesis. Results Searches resulted in 8892 records; 8561 after duplicates were removed. At the title and abstract phase 6561 articles were screened and 114 were screened at full-text phases. 26 articles met inclusion criteria. Factors operating as both facilitators and barriers include context-specificity, community engagement and participation, partnerships and collaboration, and funding. Equity was addressed in eight articles. Conclusions Implementation science frameworks utilized for active and sustainable transportation interventions in urban environments exist; however, attention to transportation equity is limited. Frameworks should be tailored to the context and flexible enough to adapt to local settings. It is recommended that equity be embedded throughout the implementation process, including meaningful engagement with communities, to promote active transportation and address local mobility needs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2026.102020
Primary Topic
Urban Transport and Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Implementation science frameworks for active and sustainable transportation interventions with a focus on equity: A scoping review

Emily McCullogh, Nazanin Jannati, Daniel Fuller, Alison Macpherson et al.
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Urban Transport and Accessibility
article

Implementation science frameworks for active and sustainable transportation interventions with a focus on equity: A scoping review

Emily McCullogh, Nazanin Jannati, Daniel Fuller, Alison Macpherson, Sarah A. Moore, Ben Beck, Maud Muosieryiri, Rebecca Maher
article en

Abstract

Background There is a growing need to promote sustainable transportation in urban environments. Active and sustainable transportation interventions are implemented through a pathway of actors responsible for funding, design, planning, and construction. This scoping review summarizes peer-reviewed literature that uses implementation science theories, models, and/or frameworks for active and sustainable transportation interventions and categorizes the included frameworks using an existing implementation science taxonomy. Barriers and facilitators to implementation are identified, as well as the inclusion of transportation equity considerations in implementation, if present. Methods Six databases were searched from inception to June 4, 2025. Records were screened at title, abstract, and full-text phases by two reviewers independently. Conflicts were resolved by consensus or with a third reviewer. Articles were summarized using thematic analysis and narrative synthesis. Results Searches resulted in 8892 records; 8561 after duplicates were removed. At the title and abstract phase 6561 articles were screened and 114 were screened at full-text phases. 26 articles met inclusion criteria. Factors operating as both facilitators and barriers include context-specificity, community engagement and participation, partnerships and collaboration, and funding. Equity was addressed in eight articles. Conclusions Implementation science frameworks utilized for active and sustainable transportation interventions in urban environments exist; however, attention to transportation equity is limited. Frameworks should be tailored to the context and flexible enough to adapt to local settings. It is recommended that equity be embedded throughout the implementation process, including meaningful engagement with communities, to promote active transportation and address local mobility needs.

Transportation Research Interdisciplinary PerspectivesVol. 38
Dalhousie University (CA), Memorial University of Newfoundland (CA), York University (CA), University of Saskatchewan (CA), Monash University (AU)
Healthy Cities Research Initiative
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Urban Transport and Accessibility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.