Statins and risk of cardiovascular disease: Emulating a primary prevention trial in breast cancer survivors

BACKGROUND: Limited evidence is available from randomized trials to guide clinical decision-making for cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention with statins among women with breast cancer. We leveraged real-world data to estimate the effect of statin therapy vs usual care on the 5-year risk of CVD among breast cancer survivors. METHODS: We sequentially emulated target trials using the National Cancer Institute-Kaiser Permanente Breast Cancer Survivors Cohort. Women aged 40 - 84 years, diagnosed with stage 0-III breast cancer from 1993 - 2022, without CVD, no statins in the past 6 months, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol from 100 - 160 mg/dL were included. The outcome was CVD (ischemic heart disease, stroke, and cardiomyopathy/heart failure). We compared statin therapy to usual care (no statins unless indicated) in intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses. RESULTS: Statin initiators were more likely to be older with a higher prevalence of cardiovascular comorbidities. In the intention-to-treat analysis, the 5-year risk difference was 0.3% (95%CI: -0.9,1.5), and risk ratio was 1.04 (95%CI: 0.86,1.25) for statin vs usual care. At 5 years, the proportion adherent to their initial strategy was 48% for statin and 24% for usual care. In the per-protocol analysis, the risk difference was -0.9% (95%CI: -2.9,2.2) and the risk ratio was 0.85 (95%CI: 0.51,1.36) for statin vs usual care. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that statin therapy may reduce the risk of CVD for breast cancer survivors, but the estimates are too imprecise for specific recommendations. Future research is needed to understand reasons for statin discontinuation, and opportunities to encourage adherence in this high-risk population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djag158
Primary Topic
Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Statins and risk of cardiovascular disease: Emulating a primary prevention trial in breast cancer survivors

Jacqueline B. Vo, Issa J Dahabreh, Ana Barac, Ruth M. Pfeiffer et al.
JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism
article

Statins and risk of cardiovascular disease: Emulating a primary prevention trial in breast cancer survivors

Jacqueline B. Vo, Issa J Dahabreh, Ana Barac, Ruth M. Pfeiffer, Rochelle E. Curtis, Heather Spencer Feigelson, Gretchen L. Gierach, Véronique L. Roger, Rienna Russo, Paloma R. Mitra, Amber N. Hurson, Quiera S. Booker, Erin J Aiello Bowles, A Blythe Ryerson, Eric B Rimm, Macy E Corley, Stacey Honda, Cody Ramin, Lene H S Veiga, Miguel A Hernán, Goodarz Danaei, Larissa White
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Limited evidence is available from randomized trials to guide clinical decision-making for cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention with statins among women with breast cancer. We leveraged real-world data to estimate the effect of statin therapy vs usual care on the 5-year risk of CVD among breast cancer survivors. METHODS: We sequentially emulated target trials using the National Cancer Institute-Kaiser Permanente Breast Cancer Survivors Cohort. Women aged 40 - 84 years, diagnosed with stage 0-III breast cancer from 1993 - 2022, without CVD, no statins in the past 6 months, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol from 100 - 160 mg/dL were included. The outcome was CVD (ischemic heart disease, stroke, and cardiomyopathy/heart failure). We compared statin therapy to usual care (no statins unless indicated) in intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses. RESULTS: Statin initiators were more likely to be older with a higher prevalence of cardiovascular comorbidities. In the intention-to-treat analysis, the 5-year risk difference was 0.3% (95%CI: -0.9,1.5), and risk ratio was 1.04 (95%CI: 0.86,1.25) for statin vs usual care. At 5 years, the proportion adherent to their initial strategy was 48% for statin and 24% for usual care. In the per-protocol analysis, the risk difference was -0.9% (95%CI: -2.9,2.2) and the risk ratio was 0.85 (95%CI: 0.51,1.36) for statin vs usual care. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that statin therapy may reduce the risk of CVD for breast cancer survivors, but the estimates are too imprecise for specific recommendations. Future research is needed to understand reasons for statin discontinuation, and opportunities to encourage adherence in this high-risk population.

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Inova Health System (US), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US), Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Hawaii Department of Health (US), Kaiser Permanente (US), Harvard University (US), Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute (US), Cancer Research And Biostatistics (US), National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (US), Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research (US), National Cancer Institute (US), Harvard Global Health Institute (US), Hawaii Permanente Medical Group (US), Deaconess Hospital (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.