Lumbar Drain Removal Timing After Open Skull Base Surgery for Malignant Tumors: A Single-Institution Observational Study

Objectives: The optimal timing of lumbar drain (LD) removal following open skull base surgery for malignant tumors remains poorly defined. This study describes practice variation in LD removal timing and examines its association with postoperative complications. Design: Single-institution retrospective cohort study. Setting: Tertiary cancer center (National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan). Participants: Consecutive patients who underwent open skull base surgery for malignant tumors with intraoperative LD placement between January 2010 and July 2025 (n = 104). Main Outcome Measures: Composite of postoperative non-contusion complications (CSF leakage, meningitis, tension pneumocephalus, cerebral infarction, intracranial hematoma, epilepsy). Propensity score–based overlap weighting (OW) and Firth’s penalized logistic regression were used for adjusted analyses. Results: Among 104 patients, 88 (84.6%) underwent immediate LD removal and 16 (15.4%) underwent late removal (median 3 days). Non-contusion complications occurred in 6 patients (6.8%) in the immediate group and 3 patients (18.8%) in the late group. Overlap-weighted analysis showed a numerically lower estimated risk with immediate removal (OR 0.23; 95% CI 0.01–4.02; weighted risks 4.5% vs. 16.7%; absolute difference −12.3%). A consistent directional trend was observed in the dural resection subgroup (n = 75; OR 0.16; 95% CI 0.01–3.79; difference −17.9%). Confidence intervals were wide and statistical significance was not reached in any analysis. Conclusions: The immediate removal group showed a numerically lower estimated complication rate, though results were not statistically significant and should be interpreted with caution given the small sample size and potential era confounding. These hypothesis-generating findings warrant prospective multicenter validation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Neurological Surgery Part B Skull Base
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2883-6742
Primary Topic
Head and Neck Surgical Oncology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lumbar Drain Removal Timing After Open Skull Base Surgery for Malignant Tumors: A Single-Institution Observational Study

Toshihiko Sakai, Shunsuke Yanagisawa, Mitsuhiko Katoh, Akihisa Tanaka et al.
Journal of Neurological Surgery Part B Skull Base
Head and Neck Surgical Oncology
article

Lumbar Drain Removal Timing After Open Skull Base Surgery for Malignant Tumors: A Single-Institution Observational Study

Toshihiko Sakai, Shunsuke Yanagisawa, Mitsuhiko Katoh, Akihisa Tanaka, Azusa Sakai, Daisuke Kawauchi, Makoto Ohno, Takaki Omura, Sorane Maezumi, Kohtaro Eguchi, Hiroki Kuroyanagi, Yoshitaka Narita, Paulina Maria, Tatsuya Ito, Seiichi Yoshimoto, Go Omura, Yoko Murayama, Chihiro Fushimi
article en

Abstract

Objectives: The optimal timing of lumbar drain (LD) removal following open skull base surgery for malignant tumors remains poorly defined. This study describes practice variation in LD removal timing and examines its association with postoperative complications. Design: Single-institution retrospective cohort study. Setting: Tertiary cancer center (National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan). Participants: Consecutive patients who underwent open skull base surgery for malignant tumors with intraoperative LD placement between January 2010 and July 2025 (n = 104). Main Outcome Measures: Composite of postoperative non-contusion complications (CSF leakage, meningitis, tension pneumocephalus, cerebral infarction, intracranial hematoma, epilepsy). Propensity score–based overlap weighting (OW) and Firth’s penalized logistic regression were used for adjusted analyses. Results: Among 104 patients, 88 (84.6%) underwent immediate LD removal and 16 (15.4%) underwent late removal (median 3 days). Non-contusion complications occurred in 6 patients (6.8%) in the immediate group and 3 patients (18.8%) in the late group. Overlap-weighted analysis showed a numerically lower estimated risk with immediate removal (OR 0.23; 95% CI 0.01–4.02; weighted risks 4.5% vs. 16.7%; absolute difference −12.3%). A consistent directional trend was observed in the dural resection subgroup (n = 75; OR 0.16; 95% CI 0.01–3.79; difference −17.9%). Confidence intervals were wide and statistical significance was not reached in any analysis. Conclusions: The immediate removal group showed a numerically lower estimated complication rate, though results were not statistically significant and should be interpreted with caution given the small sample size and potential era confounding. These hypothesis-generating findings warrant prospective multicenter validation.

Journal of Neurological Surgery Part B Skull Base
Tokyo National Hospital (JP)
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Head and Neck Surgical Oncology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.