Performance of prediction models for delayed union and nonunion after fracture: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Delayed union and nonunion are common and costly complications after fractures, yet early risk stratification remains challenging. We systematically reviewed and meta-analyzed multivariable prediction models for compromised fracture healing. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, SinoMed, and CNKI were searched from inception to 30 November 2025. Studies developing or validating models predicting delayed union, nonunion, or related healing outcomes after fractures were included. Risk of bias was assessed with PROBAST and certainty of evidence with GRADE. Discrimination was summarized using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), pooled with random-effects models by validation tier (apparent performance, internal validation, external validation), and further described by anatomical subgroup. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251252244). RESULTS: Seventy-seven studies reporting 97 model entries were included across appendicular, proximal femoral, multisite, and axial skeletal fracture settings; 56 models reported apparent performance only, 28 had internal validation, and 13 underwent external validation. Pooled AUC was 0.88 (95% CI 0.86-0.90) for apparent performance, 0.72 (95% CI 0.41-0.90) for internal validation, and 0.81 (95% CI 0.73-0.86) for external validation, with substantial heterogeneity. Apparent performance exceeded validated performance (mean optimism 0.052). CONCLUSION: Existing models often show optimistic apparent discrimination; however, discrimination alone is insufficient to justify clinical implementation, especially given limited external validation, sparse calibration reporting, major clinical and anatomical heterogeneity, and high risk of bias. Future studies should prioritize clearer outcome definitions, robust methodology, transparent reporting, independent external validation with calibration assessment, and evaluation of clinical utility before these models are used to guide care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-026-09941-4
Primary Topic
Bone fractures and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance of prediction models for delayed union and nonunion after fracture: a systematic review and meta-analysis

X L Wang, Y Zhang, Fu Cheng Yin, Gan Luo et al.
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Bone fractures and treatments
article

Performance of prediction models for delayed union and nonunion after fracture: a systematic review and meta-analysis

X L Wang, Y Zhang, Fu Cheng Yin, Gan Luo, Zhen Deng, Wentao Chen
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Delayed union and nonunion are common and costly complications after fractures, yet early risk stratification remains challenging. We systematically reviewed and meta-analyzed multivariable prediction models for compromised fracture healing. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, SinoMed, and CNKI were searched from inception to 30 November 2025. Studies developing or validating models predicting delayed union, nonunion, or related healing outcomes after fractures were included. Risk of bias was assessed with PROBAST and certainty of evidence with GRADE. Discrimination was summarized using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), pooled with random-effects models by validation tier (apparent performance, internal validation, external validation), and further described by anatomical subgroup. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251252244). RESULTS: Seventy-seven studies reporting 97 model entries were included across appendicular, proximal femoral, multisite, and axial skeletal fracture settings; 56 models reported apparent performance only, 28 had internal validation, and 13 underwent external validation. Pooled AUC was 0.88 (95% CI 0.86-0.90) for apparent performance, 0.72 (95% CI 0.41-0.90) for internal validation, and 0.81 (95% CI 0.73-0.86) for external validation, with substantial heterogeneity. Apparent performance exceeded validated performance (mean optimism 0.052). CONCLUSION: Existing models often show optimistic apparent discrimination; however, discrimination alone is insufficient to justify clinical implementation, especially given limited external validation, sparse calibration reporting, major clinical and anatomical heterogeneity, and high risk of bias. Future studies should prioritize clearer outcome definitions, robust methodology, transparent reporting, independent external validation with calibration assessment, and evaluation of clinical utility before these models are used to guide care.

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Second Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese (CN), Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN)
Sichuan Provincial Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Bone fractures and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.