Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the TOGETHER Family‐Reported Experience Measure of Nurse‐Facilitated Family Engagement in Adult Acute Care

ABSTRACT Background Family engagement improves outcomes, shortens hospital stays, and enhances patient and family experiences, yet remains inconsistently enacted despite nurses' pivotal role. Existing instruments focus on paediatrics or critical care, measure activation rather than enacted engagement, or lack robust psychometric evidence. No family‐reported measure captures nurse‐facilitated engagement in general adult acute care. Objective To develop and psychometrically evaluate a family‐reported experience measure of nurse‐facilitated family engagement in adult acute care. Methods A two‐phase mixed‐methods instrument development was completed. Phase 1 involved construct definition, item generation, expert review (content validity), and cognitive interviews. Phase 2 used a cross‐sectional survey ( n = 237) to test factor structure, reliability, and construct (convergent and discriminant) validity. Results TOGETHER (TOwards Gathering Evidence to evaluaTe in‐Hospital family partnERships) is a 23‐item scale. Structural analysis of the 20‐item analytic core (three context‐contingent items retained for content coverage but excluded a priori from factor modelling) supported a bifactor model comprising a general factor (‘family partnerships’) and two specific factors (‘communication’, ‘collaboration’). Model fit was good (CFI = 0.992, RMSEA = 0.060), and total‐score reliability was adequate ( ω = 0.79). Specific factors were moderately correlated ( r = 0.61). Conclusion TOGETHER provides a total score for evaluation and monitoring of nurse‐facilitated family engagement in adult acute care; domain‐level patterns may be examined descriptively but lack sufficient reliability for standalone scoring. The present evidence applies to the English‐language version only. Cross‐site benchmarking, cross‐group comparison, and cross‐linguistic extension require further validation. Patient or Public Contribution Family caregivers with lived experience collaborated as study investigators throughout the study. They contributed lived healthcare and caregiving experience as well as specialist expertise in person‐centred care policy. Their involvement spanned study conduct, item development and manuscript preparation, including review of the final manuscript prior to submission. An additional group of people with lived experience provided their perspectives on the instrument during pretesting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Expectations
Published
2026-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.70699
Primary Topic
Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the TOGETHER Family‐Reported Experience Measure of Nurse‐Facilitated Family Engagement in Adult Acute Care

Julie Cussen, Benjamin R. Mackie, Amanda Corley, Whitney Kelly et al.
Health Expectations
Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
article

Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the TOGETHER Family‐Reported Experience Measure of Nurse‐Facilitated Family Engagement in Adult Acute Care

Julie Cussen, Benjamin R. Mackie, Amanda Corley, Whitney Kelly, Jolanda Maaskant, Michael J. Ireland, Anne M. Eskes, Lachlan Kelly, Andrea P. Marshall, Thom J. T. Westdorp, Georgia Tobiano
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Family engagement improves outcomes, shortens hospital stays, and enhances patient and family experiences, yet remains inconsistently enacted despite nurses' pivotal role. Existing instruments focus on paediatrics or critical care, measure activation rather than enacted engagement, or lack robust psychometric evidence. No family‐reported measure captures nurse‐facilitated engagement in general adult acute care. Objective To develop and psychometrically evaluate a family‐reported experience measure of nurse‐facilitated family engagement in adult acute care. Methods A two‐phase mixed‐methods instrument development was completed. Phase 1 involved construct definition, item generation, expert review (content validity), and cognitive interviews. Phase 2 used a cross‐sectional survey ( n = 237) to test factor structure, reliability, and construct (convergent and discriminant) validity. Results TOGETHER (TOwards Gathering Evidence to evaluaTe in‐Hospital family partnERships) is a 23‐item scale. Structural analysis of the 20‐item analytic core (three context‐contingent items retained for content coverage but excluded a priori from factor modelling) supported a bifactor model comprising a general factor (‘family partnerships’) and two specific factors (‘communication’, ‘collaboration’). Model fit was good (CFI = 0.992, RMSEA = 0.060), and total‐score reliability was adequate ( ω = 0.79). Specific factors were moderately correlated ( r = 0.61). Conclusion TOGETHER provides a total score for evaluation and monitoring of nurse‐facilitated family engagement in adult acute care; domain‐level patterns may be examined descriptively but lack sufficient reliability for standalone scoring. The present evidence applies to the English‐language version only. Cross‐site benchmarking, cross‐group comparison, and cross‐linguistic extension require further validation. Patient or Public Contribution Family caregivers with lived experience collaborated as study investigators throughout the study. They contributed lived healthcare and caregiving experience as well as specialist expertise in person‐centred care policy. Their involvement spanned study conduct, item development and manuscript preparation, including review of the final manuscript prior to submission. An additional group of people with lived experience provided their perspectives on the instrument during pretesting.

Health ExpectationsVol. 29(3)
Griffith University (AU), University of Southern Queensland (AU), Gold Coast Hospital (AU), Princess Alexandra Hospital (AU), Amsterdam Neuroscience (NL), Public Health Service of Amsterdam (NL), Queensland Emergency Medicine Research Foundation (AU), Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences (NL), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.