Real-world data for a CDK4/6 inhibitor, palbociclib, as 1st- or 2nd-line therapy in HR+/HER2− metastatic breast cancer: a multicenter prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: Palbociclib (PAL), the first CDK4/6 inhibitor approved for breast cancer, improves progression-free survival (PFS) in hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/HER2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) when added to an aromatase inhibitor or fulvestrant, but also increases toxicity compared to endocrine therapy alone. Use of PAL in 1st-line treatment increases the burden on patients and adds to costs compared to use as 2nd-line treatment, due to the longer period of 1st-line treatment. Therefore, data on use of PAL in a real-world setting are required to assess the merits of 1st- and 2nd-line therapy in the sequence of treatment for MBC. METHODS: A prospective observational study was performed in patients with postmenopausal metastatic or unresectable breast cancer using PAL in 1st-, 2nd-, or 3rd-line treatment. The primary endpoint was PFS (start of PAL to progression or death). Secondary endpoints included PFS2 (start of 1st-line endocrine treatment to second progression) and adverse events. RESULTS: The study included 593 patients treated with PAL (246 1st-line, 282 2nd-line, 65 3rd-line) from April 2019 to January 2023. Median PFS was 25.8 (95%CI: 21.4), 18.0 (14.0-22.7), and 12.0 (7.7-17.4) months, for 1st-, 2nd- and 3rd-line use respectively. Median PFS2 was 36.9 (27.7-not reached) and 57.9 (43.4-65.3) months in the 1st- and 2nd-line cohorts. Neutropenia of grade ≥ 3 occurred in 70% of patients, and > 80% required dose reductions. CONCLUSIONS: PFS for the 1st-line cohort was similar to that in PALOMA-2, while the 2nd-line cohort had better outcomes than those in PALOMA-3, even when modelled for potential bias since some patients on 1st-line endocrine monotherapy would have received chemotherapy rather than 2nd-line PAL. Overall, the findings in this study of real-life treatment of patients with HR+/HER2- MBC support randomized control trial data that challenge the need to use a CDK4/6 inhibitor in the 1st-line setting for all patients. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN000035863.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Breast Cancer Research
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-026-02313-9
Primary Topic
Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Real-world data for a CDK4/6 inhibitor, palbociclib, as 1st- or 2nd-line therapy in HR+/HER2− metastatic breast cancer: a multicenter prospective cohort study

Yukari Uemura, Uhi Toh, Miyuki Kitahara, Reiki Nishimura et al.
Breast Cancer Research
Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
article

Real-world data for a CDK4/6 inhibitor, palbociclib, as 1st- or 2nd-line therapy in HR+/HER2− metastatic breast cancer: a multicenter prospective cohort study

Yukari Uemura, Uhi Toh, Miyuki Kitahara, Reiki Nishimura, Kazutaka Narui, Shintaro Takao, Daisuke Takabatake, Naruto Taira, K Yamagami, Akimitsu Yamada, Hirohito Seki, Toru Yokota, Hiroshi Kaise, Y. Kikawa, Kimito Yamada, Masahiro Kitada, Takashi Ishikawa, Hideki Nishimura, Hirofumi Mukai, Tsuyoshi Saito
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Palbociclib (PAL), the first CDK4/6 inhibitor approved for breast cancer, improves progression-free survival (PFS) in hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/HER2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) when added to an aromatase inhibitor or fulvestrant, but also increases toxicity compared to endocrine therapy alone. Use of PAL in 1st-line treatment increases the burden on patients and adds to costs compared to use as 2nd-line treatment, due to the longer period of 1st-line treatment. Therefore, data on use of PAL in a real-world setting are required to assess the merits of 1st- and 2nd-line therapy in the sequence of treatment for MBC. METHODS: A prospective observational study was performed in patients with postmenopausal metastatic or unresectable breast cancer using PAL in 1st-, 2nd-, or 3rd-line treatment. The primary endpoint was PFS (start of PAL to progression or death). Secondary endpoints included PFS2 (start of 1st-line endocrine treatment to second progression) and adverse events. RESULTS: The study included 593 patients treated with PAL (246 1st-line, 282 2nd-line, 65 3rd-line) from April 2019 to January 2023. Median PFS was 25.8 (95%CI: 21.4), 18.0 (14.0-22.7), and 12.0 (7.7-17.4) months, for 1st-, 2nd- and 3rd-line use respectively. Median PFS2 was 36.9 (27.7-not reached) and 57.9 (43.4-65.3) months in the 1st- and 2nd-line cohorts. Neutropenia of grade ≥ 3 occurred in 70% of patients, and > 80% required dose reductions. CONCLUSIONS: PFS for the 1st-line cohort was similar to that in PALOMA-2, while the 2nd-line cohort had better outcomes than those in PALOMA-3, even when modelled for potential bias since some patients on 1st-line endocrine monotherapy would have received chemotherapy rather than 2nd-line PAL. Overall, the findings in this study of real-life treatment of patients with HR+/HER2- MBC support randomized control trial data that challenge the need to use a CDK4/6 inhibitor in the 1st-line setting for all patients. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN000035863.

Breast Cancer Research
Kurume University (JP), Kansai Medical University (JP), Asahikawa Medical University (JP), Tokyo Medical University (JP), Kawasaki Medical School (JP), Yokohama City University Medical Center (JP), Tokyo Medical Center (JP), Yokohama City University Hospital (JP), Nagano Municipal Hospital (JP), Institute for Health Economics and Policy (JP), University of Miyazaki Hospital (JP), Shinko Hospital (JP), Ibaraki Prefectural Central Hospital (JP), Shikoku Cancer Center (JP), National Cancer Center Hospital East (JP), Gunma Children's Medical Center (JP), Saitama Red Cross Hospital (JP), Yokohama City University (JP)
Pfizer’s Centers for Therapeutic Innovation
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.