GeoAI Framework for Evaluation of Deep Learning Models in Water Body Segmentation

Abstract. Accurate delineation of surface water bodies from satellite imagery is fundamental for hydrological monitoring, disaster management, and environmental assessment. Deep learning–based semantic segmentation has shown great promise for this task, yet the relative performance of widely used encoder–decoder architectures remain insufficiently explored under consistent experimental settings. This study presents a GeoAI-based evaluation of four state-of-the-art segmentation architectures: U-Net, U-Net++, DeepLabV3+, and Feature Pyramid Network (FPN), all employing a ResNet-34 encoder pretrained on ImageNet. Using the Earth Surface Water Dataset, we applied an identical tiling strategy, preprocessing pipeline, data augmentation, optimizer configuration, and training schedule to ensure a fair comparison. Our results show that DeepLabV3+ achieved the highest accuracy with an IoU of 0.955 and Dice of 0.973, followed by U-Net++ (IoU 0.945, Dice 0.969) and U-Net (IoU 0.9352, Dice 0.9598). FPN performed comparatively lower with an IoU of 0.9218 and Dice of 0.9514. These findings demonstrate that architectural choices substantially influence segmentation quality even with identical encoders and training protocols. The study provides benchmark results and practical insights for selecting deep learning architectures for operational water body mapping in remote sensing applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ISPRS annals of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-x-4-w8-2025-465-2026
Primary Topic
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

GeoAI Framework for Evaluation of Deep Learning Models in Water Body Segmentation

Mohammad Kordmafi, Amirhossein Mahmoudnia
ISPRS annals of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
article

GeoAI Framework for Evaluation of Deep Learning Models in Water Body Segmentation

Mohammad Kordmafi, Amirhossein Mahmoudnia
article en

Abstract

Abstract. Accurate delineation of surface water bodies from satellite imagery is fundamental for hydrological monitoring, disaster management, and environmental assessment. Deep learning–based semantic segmentation has shown great promise for this task, yet the relative performance of widely used encoder–decoder architectures remain insufficiently explored under consistent experimental settings. This study presents a GeoAI-based evaluation of four state-of-the-art segmentation architectures: U-Net, U-Net++, DeepLabV3+, and Feature Pyramid Network (FPN), all employing a ResNet-34 encoder pretrained on ImageNet. Using the Earth Surface Water Dataset, we applied an identical tiling strategy, preprocessing pipeline, data augmentation, optimizer configuration, and training schedule to ensure a fair comparison. Our results show that DeepLabV3+ achieved the highest accuracy with an IoU of 0.955 and Dice of 0.973, followed by U-Net++ (IoU 0.945, Dice 0.969) and U-Net (IoU 0.9352, Dice 0.9598). FPN performed comparatively lower with an IoU of 0.9218 and Dice of 0.9514. These findings demonstrate that architectural choices substantially influence segmentation quality even with identical encoders and training protocols. The study provides benchmark results and practical insights for selecting deep learning architectures for operational water body mapping in remote sensing applications.

ISPRS annals of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciencesVol. X-4/W8-2025
University of Tehran (IR)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.