Differences in clinical presentation between heart failure patients with reduced and preserved ejection fraction – analysis of the INTELHEART database

BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) is a major global health issue with significant morbidity, mortality, and economic burden. Differentiating between heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is essential for diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the clinical, laboratory, and echocardiographic characteristics of patients with HFrEF and HFpEF. METHODS: This retrospective, multicentre study included 2156 patients diagnosed with HF between 2003 and 2023 across four Serbian medical institutions. Patients were classified into HFrEF (LVEF <40%) or HFpEF (LVEF ≥50%) groups. Patients with mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF) were excluded. Clinical symptoms, comorbidities, laboratory findings, and echocardiographic data were analysed and compared between groups. RESULTS: ). HFpEF patients had higher rates of hypertension, atrial fibrillation, and obesity, while HFrEF patients more frequently had prior myocardial infarction and valvular disease. NT-proBNP, troponin, and CRP levels were significantly higher in HFrEF. Echocardiography showed greater left ventricular dilation and dysfunction in HFrEF, while HFpEF patients had preserved systolic but impaired diastolic function. CONCLUSIONS: Significant differences in demographic, clinical, and diagnostic profiles exist between HFrEF and HFpEF patients. Understanding these distinctions may enhance early recognition, risk stratification, and tailored therapeutic strategies for each phenotype.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta cardiologica. Supplementum
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00015385.2026.2677977
Primary Topic
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Differences in clinical presentation between heart failure patients with reduced and preserved ejection fraction – analysis of the INTELHEART database

Tijana Geroski, Milan Rodić, Smiljana Tomašević, Nikola Stipic et al.
Acta cardiologica. Supplementum
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
article

Differences in clinical presentation between heart failure patients with reduced and preserved ejection fraction – analysis of the INTELHEART database

Tijana Geroski, Milan Rodić, Smiljana Tomašević, Nikola Stipic, Tamara Filipović, L V Velicki, M Belopavlovic, D J Jakovljevic, Svetlana Apostolovic, Nenad Filipović, Andrej T. Preveden, Marija Polovina, Aleksandra Milovančev, Stefan Simović, Goran Davidović
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) is a major global health issue with significant morbidity, mortality, and economic burden. Differentiating between heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is essential for diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the clinical, laboratory, and echocardiographic characteristics of patients with HFrEF and HFpEF. METHODS: This retrospective, multicentre study included 2156 patients diagnosed with HF between 2003 and 2023 across four Serbian medical institutions. Patients were classified into HFrEF (LVEF <40%) or HFpEF (LVEF ≥50%) groups. Patients with mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF) were excluded. Clinical symptoms, comorbidities, laboratory findings, and echocardiographic data were analysed and compared between groups. RESULTS: ). HFpEF patients had higher rates of hypertension, atrial fibrillation, and obesity, while HFrEF patients more frequently had prior myocardial infarction and valvular disease. NT-proBNP, troponin, and CRP levels were significantly higher in HFrEF. Echocardiography showed greater left ventricular dilation and dysfunction in HFrEF, while HFpEF patients had preserved systolic but impaired diastolic function. CONCLUSIONS: Significant differences in demographic, clinical, and diagnostic profiles exist between HFrEF and HFpEF patients. Understanding these distinctions may enhance early recognition, risk stratification, and tailored therapeutic strategies for each phenotype.

Acta cardiologica. Supplementum
University of Kragujevac (RS), University of Nis (RS), University of Novi Sad (RS), University of Belgrade (RS), Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases of Vojvodina (RS), Institute of Public Health of Vojvodina (RS), Bioengineering Center (RU), Institute for Pulmonary Diseases of Vojvodina (RS), Clinical Centre of Kragujevac (RS), Health & Life (Taiwan) (TW), Coventry University (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.