Motivations for Joining and Pathways to Engagement in Leftist Violent Extremist Groups

Our research explores the motivations and pathways for engaging in antifascist (Antifa) and far-left violent extremist groups. 10 current or former left-wing violent extremists in the United States participated in qualitative, in-depth, life-history interviews. Informed by the Federal Bureau of Investigation Behavioral Analysis Unit 1's, "Beyond Belief: Preventing and Countering Violent Extremism in America," this study examines leftist violent extremism in terms of common radicalization pull factors, push factors, personal factors, and pathways to engagement. Our study identifies three potential pathways to leftist violent extremism (VE) and closely examines the motivating factors of subjects' involvement. This research is relevant to counter-violent extremism (CVE) scholars, law enforcement personnel, and policymakers because it elucidates how and why some Americans become involved in left-wing VE groups, as well as the similarities and distinctions between leftist VE groups and VE groups with other ideological persuasions. By better understanding motivations and pathways to engagement in leftist VE groups, we hope to inform counter-terrorism prevention and intervention efforts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Behavioral Sciences & the Law
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.70071
Primary Topic
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Motivations for Joining and Pathways to Engagement in Leftist Violent Extremist Groups

April Celeste Gould, Park Dietz, Jaiden Rogers
Behavioral Sciences & the Law
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
article

Motivations for Joining and Pathways to Engagement in Leftist Violent Extremist Groups

April Celeste Gould, Park Dietz, Jaiden Rogers
article en

Abstract

Our research explores the motivations and pathways for engaging in antifascist (Antifa) and far-left violent extremist groups. 10 current or former left-wing violent extremists in the United States participated in qualitative, in-depth, life-history interviews. Informed by the Federal Bureau of Investigation Behavioral Analysis Unit 1's, "Beyond Belief: Preventing and Countering Violent Extremism in America," this study examines leftist violent extremism in terms of common radicalization pull factors, push factors, personal factors, and pathways to engagement. Our study identifies three potential pathways to leftist violent extremism (VE) and closely examines the motivating factors of subjects' involvement. This research is relevant to counter-violent extremism (CVE) scholars, law enforcement personnel, and policymakers because it elucidates how and why some Americans become involved in left-wing VE groups, as well as the similarities and distinctions between leftist VE groups and VE groups with other ideological persuasions. By better understanding motivations and pathways to engagement in leftist VE groups, we hope to inform counter-terrorism prevention and intervention efforts.

Behavioral Sciences & the Law
Amen Clinics (US), Pacific Research Group (United States) (US), Getty Research Institute (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Motivations for Joining and Pathways to Engagement in Leftist Violent Extremist Groups — April Celeste Gould, Park Dietz, et al. · Behavioral Sciences & the Law (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS