Addressing the Bottlenecks in Machine Learning and Physics-based Approaches to Structure-based Virtual Screening

Researchers have long sought to harness the power of computers to assist in drug discovery. Structure-based virtual screening (SBVS) uses the 3D structure of a target binding site to quickly score protein-ligand binding affinities, enabling the screening of large chemical libraries. Although this technique has been used for decades, its success has mostly been limited to targets with many known binders. The two predominant SBVS paradigms, machine learning (ML) and physics-based approaches, both face significant challenges with novel targets. ML models struggle to generalize beyond their training data, leading to unreliable predictions for unseen targets. Physics-based methods, while more theoretically grounded, suffer from an inherent tradeoff between speed and accuracy; absolute binding free energy (ABFE) calculations, the most reliable approach, remain computationally prohibitive for large-scale screening. I have addressed these limitations by improving both ML and physics-based approaches. I first enhanced the generalization capabilities of ML models by incorporating a broader range of training data. I additionally developed a novel algorithm for proposing 3D ligand binding poses using a physics-inspired ML approach. I also developed a new metric for assessing the performance of virtual screening models in more realistic scenarios. I also accelerated ABFE calculations through a novel application of spatial data structures, improving efficiency without sacrificing accuracy. Finally, I developed a hybrid algorithm that integrates ML and physics-based methodologies, leveraging the strengths of both to improve SBVS performance on novel targets.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
UNC Libraries
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17615/ye5n-hn49
Primary Topic
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Addressing the Bottlenecks in Machine Learning and Physics-based Approaches to Structure-based Virtual Screening

Michael Brocidiacono
UNC Libraries
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
article

Addressing the Bottlenecks in Machine Learning and Physics-based Approaches to Structure-based Virtual Screening

Michael Brocidiacono
article en

Abstract

Researchers have long sought to harness the power of computers to assist in drug discovery. Structure-based virtual screening (SBVS) uses the 3D structure of a target binding site to quickly score protein-ligand binding affinities, enabling the screening of large chemical libraries. Although this technique has been used for decades, its success has mostly been limited to targets with many known binders. The two predominant SBVS paradigms, machine learning (ML) and physics-based approaches, both face significant challenges with novel targets. ML models struggle to generalize beyond their training data, leading to unreliable predictions for unseen targets. Physics-based methods, while more theoretically grounded, suffer from an inherent tradeoff between speed and accuracy; absolute binding free energy (ABFE) calculations, the most reliable approach, remain computationally prohibitive for large-scale screening. I have addressed these limitations by improving both ML and physics-based approaches. I first enhanced the generalization capabilities of ML models by incorporating a broader range of training data. I additionally developed a novel algorithm for proposing 3D ligand binding poses using a physics-inspired ML approach. I also developed a new metric for assessing the performance of virtual screening models in more realistic scenarios. I also accelerated ABFE calculations through a novel application of spatial data structures, improving efficiency without sacrificing accuracy. Finally, I developed a hybrid algorithm that integrates ML and physics-based methodologies, leveraging the strengths of both to improve SBVS performance on novel targets.

UNC Libraries
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.