Supply chain relationships in the wood biomass industry

Purpose This paper aims to use the Industrial Marketing and Purchasing (IMP) Actors–Resources–Activities (ARA) framework to investigate the cooperation between actors (suppliers, customers and intermediaries) in Poland’s wood biomass supply chain, as well as the activities and resources that underpin these relationships. It focuses particularly on the degree of cooperation and coordination between firms, the barriers to building long-term partnerships and the potential opportunities arising from better supply chain integration. Design/methodology/approach A mixed-methods design was used, combining three focus group interviews with 18 participants, and a computer-assisted telephone interview survey of 300 firms. Triangulating thematic analysis and descriptive statistics enabled both depth and sector-level generalisation. Findings Relationships in the Polish wood biomass industry are predominantly transactional, local and short term, focusing on price and immediate delivery rather than joint planning or knowledge sharing. High transport and storage costs, quality control issues and limited trust discourage resource pooling. However, respondents recognise significant opportunities, such as rising bioenergy demand, innovations in recycling technologies, and cost-sharing logistics hubs, which could stimulate cluster-type cooperation if institutional support and clear standards emerge. Research limitations/implications The findings are based on a single-country, cross-sectional sample and partly on self-reported perceptions. Longitudinal and comparative studies are required to examine network evolution and performance. Practical implications Managers should prioritise trust-building mechanisms, shared quality protocols and joint logistics investments to reduce costs and access new markets. Policymakers can catalyse collaboration through stable regulations, targeted grants and cluster facilitation, thereby accelerating both competitiveness and the achievement of circular economy goals. Originality/value This study is pioneering in its application of the IMP approach lens to the coordination of a wood biomass supply chain. It empirically maps actor–activity–resource interactions, exposing behavioural and infrastructural bottlenecks that hinder the transition to a circular economy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jbim-07-2025-0605
Primary Topic
Forest Biomass Utilization and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Supply chain relationships in the wood biomass industry

Arkadiusz Kawa
Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing
Forest Biomass Utilization and Management
article

Supply chain relationships in the wood biomass industry

Arkadiusz Kawa
article en

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to use the Industrial Marketing and Purchasing (IMP) Actors–Resources–Activities (ARA) framework to investigate the cooperation between actors (suppliers, customers and intermediaries) in Poland’s wood biomass supply chain, as well as the activities and resources that underpin these relationships. It focuses particularly on the degree of cooperation and coordination between firms, the barriers to building long-term partnerships and the potential opportunities arising from better supply chain integration. Design/methodology/approach A mixed-methods design was used, combining three focus group interviews with 18 participants, and a computer-assisted telephone interview survey of 300 firms. Triangulating thematic analysis and descriptive statistics enabled both depth and sector-level generalisation. Findings Relationships in the Polish wood biomass industry are predominantly transactional, local and short term, focusing on price and immediate delivery rather than joint planning or knowledge sharing. High transport and storage costs, quality control issues and limited trust discourage resource pooling. However, respondents recognise significant opportunities, such as rising bioenergy demand, innovations in recycling technologies, and cost-sharing logistics hubs, which could stimulate cluster-type cooperation if institutional support and clear standards emerge. Research limitations/implications The findings are based on a single-country, cross-sectional sample and partly on self-reported perceptions. Longitudinal and comparative studies are required to examine network evolution and performance. Practical implications Managers should prioritise trust-building mechanisms, shared quality protocols and joint logistics investments to reduce costs and access new markets. Policymakers can catalyse collaboration through stable regulations, targeted grants and cluster facilitation, thereby accelerating both competitiveness and the achievement of circular economy goals. Originality/value This study is pioneering in its application of the IMP approach lens to the coordination of a wood biomass supply chain. It empirically maps actor–activity–resource interactions, exposing behavioural and infrastructural bottlenecks that hinder the transition to a circular economy.

Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing
Poznań University of Economics and Business (PL)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Forest Biomass Utilization and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.