A Watched Blossom Seldom Blooms: Board Interlocks and Digital Business Model Innovation

Digital business model innovation (DBMI) represents a critical yet challenging form of strategic adaptation for firms navigating modern technological changes. This study investigates how the directionality of board interlock ties—whether ties are sent or received—shapes a focal firm’s engagement in DBMI. Drawing on a coevolutionary stochastic actor-oriented model (SAOM) applied to a longitudinal dataset, our baseline results reveal an intriguing asymmetry: receiving ties exert a stronger influence on a focal firm’s DBMI than sending ties. To probe this divergence, we abductively unpack the underlying diffusion frictions spanning attention, interpretation, and validation. The results point to attention friction as the primary bottleneck: when boards face heightened attentional scarcity, such as when firms experience CEO succession or operate under high business diversification, the relative advantage of receiving ties over sending ties is magnified. Our work deepens the understanding of how the directionality of board interlock ties channels organizational learning to foster strategic adaptation in the digital age.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Management
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063261446895
Primary Topic
Innovation and Knowledge Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Watched Blossom Seldom Blooms: Board Interlocks and Digital Business Model Innovation

F Liu, Liang Chen, Jingtao Yi
Journal of Management
Innovation and Knowledge Management
article

A Watched Blossom Seldom Blooms: Board Interlocks and Digital Business Model Innovation

F Liu, Liang Chen, Jingtao Yi
article en

Abstract

Digital business model innovation (DBMI) represents a critical yet challenging form of strategic adaptation for firms navigating modern technological changes. This study investigates how the directionality of board interlock ties—whether ties are sent or received—shapes a focal firm’s engagement in DBMI. Drawing on a coevolutionary stochastic actor-oriented model (SAOM) applied to a longitudinal dataset, our baseline results reveal an intriguing asymmetry: receiving ties exert a stronger influence on a focal firm’s DBMI than sending ties. To probe this divergence, we abductively unpack the underlying diffusion frictions spanning attention, interpretation, and validation. The results point to attention friction as the primary bottleneck: when boards face heightened attentional scarcity, such as when firms experience CEO succession or operate under high business diversification, the relative advantage of receiving ties over sending ties is magnified. Our work deepens the understanding of how the directionality of board interlock ties channels organizational learning to foster strategic adaptation in the digital age.

Journal of Management
Renmin University of China (CN), Singapore Management University (SG), University of Science and Technology Beijing (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, National Social Science Fund of China
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Innovation and Knowledge Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.