Gen AI and Linguistic Transparency

Generative AI tools, such as ChatGPT, Google Gemini, and Copilot, are increasingly embedded in everyday life for quick answers for learning, research, and decision making. These AI responses tend to be presented in full confidence, which can lead users to accept information without skepticism. However, not all prompts have clear or definitive answers, and errors or hallucinations can occur. Absolute language can eliminate the instinct to fact check these answers, or question why the program chooses one option over another. When AI models use absolute language to deliver non-binary or objectively false answers, they bypass the user’s natural skepticism. This project investigates linguistic certainty indicators in generative AI responses through a multi-faceted approach: academic research, comparative AI response analysis, and the development of a diagnostic software tool. The project will be composed of research overview, analysis of generative AI responses, and the ethical implications of absolute language. By proposing a framework of uncertainty indicators, this project aims to shift user behavior from passive consumption to active verification, ultimately advocating for greater transparency in AI-human communication.   This project was developed as part of the University Library AI Fellows Program, supported by the Library AI Studio and the Provost’s AI Acceleration Program.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
UNC Libraries
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17615/bk7a-ak85
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gen AI and Linguistic Transparency

Aniela Haines
UNC Libraries
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Gen AI and Linguistic Transparency

Aniela Haines
article en

Abstract

Generative AI tools, such as ChatGPT, Google Gemini, and Copilot, are increasingly embedded in everyday life for quick answers for learning, research, and decision making. These AI responses tend to be presented in full confidence, which can lead users to accept information without skepticism. However, not all prompts have clear or definitive answers, and errors or hallucinations can occur. Absolute language can eliminate the instinct to fact check these answers, or question why the program chooses one option over another. When AI models use absolute language to deliver non-binary or objectively false answers, they bypass the user’s natural skepticism. This project investigates linguistic certainty indicators in generative AI responses through a multi-faceted approach: academic research, comparative AI response analysis, and the development of a diagnostic software tool. The project will be composed of research overview, analysis of generative AI responses, and the ethical implications of absolute language. By proposing a framework of uncertainty indicators, this project aims to shift user behavior from passive consumption to active verification, ultimately advocating for greater transparency in AI-human communication.   This project was developed as part of the University Library AI Fellows Program, supported by the Library AI Studio and the Provost’s AI Acceleration Program.

UNC Libraries
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.