Double-Vision: American Intelligence and Competing Norms of Diplomatic Conduct in Wartime Chongqing 1941-1943

This thesis examines the Research and Analysis branch of the Office of Strategic Services in Chongqing from 1941 to 1943. It argues that OSS under William Donovan morphed from a civilian outfit that encouraged freedom of research and innovation into a narrow and militarized outfit by 1943. Intra-agency competition in Washington forced Donovan to focus OSS on the short-term war effort and anchor it in traditional norms of state-to-state diplomacy. These changes permitted OSS’s survival to the end of the war, but sidelined the visions of its civilian scholars, especially area experts John Fairbank and Charles Remer. Motivated by intellectual partnership and an idea of a China created in an American image, area experts ignored traditional norms of diplomacy in order to build individual relationships with Chinese intellectuals predicated on scholarship and shared values. The clash between scholars, bureaucrats, and soldiers demonstrated the problems with employing area expertise as a tool of diplomacy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
UNC Libraries
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17615/n2g8-mh16
Primary Topic
Intelligence, Security, War Strategy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Double-Vision: American Intelligence and Competing Norms of Diplomatic Conduct in Wartime Chongqing 1941-1943

Sivan David
UNC Libraries
Intelligence, Security, War Strategy
article

Double-Vision: American Intelligence and Competing Norms of Diplomatic Conduct in Wartime Chongqing 1941-1943

Sivan David
article en

Abstract

This thesis examines the Research and Analysis branch of the Office of Strategic Services in Chongqing from 1941 to 1943. It argues that OSS under William Donovan morphed from a civilian outfit that encouraged freedom of research and innovation into a narrow and militarized outfit by 1943. Intra-agency competition in Washington forced Donovan to focus OSS on the short-term war effort and anchor it in traditional norms of state-to-state diplomacy. These changes permitted OSS’s survival to the end of the war, but sidelined the visions of its civilian scholars, especially area experts John Fairbank and Charles Remer. Motivated by intellectual partnership and an idea of a China created in an American image, area experts ignored traditional norms of diplomacy in order to build individual relationships with Chinese intellectuals predicated on scholarship and shared values. The clash between scholars, bureaucrats, and soldiers demonstrated the problems with employing area expertise as a tool of diplomacy.

UNC Libraries
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Intelligence, Security, War Strategy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.