Identifying Low-Risk Trauma Patients for Blunt Cerebrovascular Injury: Evidence From the North Carolina Trauma Registry

BackgroundBlunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) is a serious complication of blunt trauma with high rates of morbidity and mortality. There is evidence to support universal screening, but this raises concerns about cost, radiation exposure, and system burden. This study examined the connection between clinical factors at initial presentation and BCVI risk to identify opportunities to improve imaging utilization.MethodsWe analyzed patients with blunt injury from the North Carolina Trauma Registry (2016-2021). Blunt cerebrovascular injury was identified using ICD-10 codes. Clinical risk factors evaluated were low Glasgow Coma Score (GCS), significant supraclavicular injury (above-the-clavicle (ATC) injury), and trauma activation level. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of BCVI.ResultsAmong 198 211 blunt trauma patients, 1336 (0.70%) were diagnosed with BCVI. The highest prevalence was among patients with both a low GCS and significant ATC injury (4.0%), followed by those with only ATC injury (1.5%). Only two cases (0.001%) occurred in patients with neither indicator. The adjusted odds ratios for BCVI were 3.0 (95% CI: 2.6-3.5) for low GCS and 2.8 (95% CI: 2.4-3.2) for level 1 trauma activation. Above-the-clavicle injury was nearly a perfect predictor of BCVI.ConclusionsPatients without altered mental status or significant injuries above the clavicle had an extremely low risk of BCVI. Although liberal screening strategies remain important to prevent missed injuries, our findings suggest that a clearly defined low-risk subgroup may not require routine CTA screening. Prospective, multicenter validation of contemporary screening criteria is needed to refine risk stratification and optimize cross-sectional imaging utilization.Level of EvidenceLevel III, Prognostic/Epidemiological.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The American Surgeon
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348261455087
Primary Topic
Shoulder and Clavicle Injuries
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identifying Low-Risk Trauma Patients for Blunt Cerebrovascular Injury: Evidence From the North Carolina Trauma Registry

Mph Jared Gallaher, Pascal Osi Udekwu, Sharon Schiro, James Winslow et al.
The American Surgeon
Shoulder and Clavicle Injuries
article

Identifying Low-Risk Trauma Patients for Blunt Cerebrovascular Injury: Evidence From the North Carolina Trauma Registry

Mph Jared Gallaher, Pascal Osi Udekwu, Sharon Schiro, James Winslow, Martin Avery, Jaclyn Portelli-Tremont
article en

Abstract

BackgroundBlunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) is a serious complication of blunt trauma with high rates of morbidity and mortality. There is evidence to support universal screening, but this raises concerns about cost, radiation exposure, and system burden. This study examined the connection between clinical factors at initial presentation and BCVI risk to identify opportunities to improve imaging utilization.MethodsWe analyzed patients with blunt injury from the North Carolina Trauma Registry (2016-2021). Blunt cerebrovascular injury was identified using ICD-10 codes. Clinical risk factors evaluated were low Glasgow Coma Score (GCS), significant supraclavicular injury (above-the-clavicle (ATC) injury), and trauma activation level. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of BCVI.ResultsAmong 198 211 blunt trauma patients, 1336 (0.70%) were diagnosed with BCVI. The highest prevalence was among patients with both a low GCS and significant ATC injury (4.0%), followed by those with only ATC injury (1.5%). Only two cases (0.001%) occurred in patients with neither indicator. The adjusted odds ratios for BCVI were 3.0 (95% CI: 2.6-3.5) for low GCS and 2.8 (95% CI: 2.4-3.2) for level 1 trauma activation. Above-the-clavicle injury was nearly a perfect predictor of BCVI.ConclusionsPatients without altered mental status or significant injuries above the clavicle had an extremely low risk of BCVI. Although liberal screening strategies remain important to prevent missed injuries, our findings suggest that a clearly defined low-risk subgroup may not require routine CTA screening. Prospective, multicenter validation of contemporary screening criteria is needed to refine risk stratification and optimize cross-sectional imaging utilization.Level of EvidenceLevel III, Prognostic/Epidemiological.

The American Surgeon
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), WakeMed (US), Wake Forest University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Shoulder and Clavicle Injuries
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.