Are foreigners granted leniency? An analysis of drug sentencing in China

Drug crimes are socially and politically constructed phenomena that are frequently embedded in narratives about foreign threats and national security. Yet research on how nationality structures sentencing outcomes, particularly in China, remains limited. Analyzing 2804 first-instance drug crime judgments (2017–2019) from the Peking University Law Database, this study reveals a patterned and stratified relationship between nationality and punishment. Foreign defendants generally receive harsher sentences than Chinese citizens, but this disparity varies across groups. Defendants from certain Asian countries face the most severe penalties, whereas African and European/American defendants often receive comparatively lenient outcomes. These results challenge a simple “alien penalty” account and instead point to a differentiated and crime-contingent mechanism in which national origin intersects with security narratives and stereotypes surrounding transnational drug trafficking. The study advances focal concerns theory beyond Western contexts by demonstrating that nationality operates as a hierarchically structured and situationally activated status cue in judicial decision-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Punishment & Society
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14624745261454684
Primary Topic
Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Are foreigners granted leniency? An analysis of drug sentencing in China

Lena Y. Zhong, Mengliang Dai, Yiwei Xia
Punishment & Society
Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance
article

Are foreigners granted leniency? An analysis of drug sentencing in China

Lena Y. Zhong, Mengliang Dai, Yiwei Xia
article en

Abstract

Drug crimes are socially and politically constructed phenomena that are frequently embedded in narratives about foreign threats and national security. Yet research on how nationality structures sentencing outcomes, particularly in China, remains limited. Analyzing 2804 first-instance drug crime judgments (2017–2019) from the Peking University Law Database, this study reveals a patterned and stratified relationship between nationality and punishment. Foreign defendants generally receive harsher sentences than Chinese citizens, but this disparity varies across groups. Defendants from certain Asian countries face the most severe penalties, whereas African and European/American defendants often receive comparatively lenient outcomes. These results challenge a simple “alien penalty” account and instead point to a differentiated and crime-contingent mechanism in which national origin intersects with security narratives and stereotypes surrounding transnational drug trafficking. The study advances focal concerns theory beyond Western contexts by demonstrating that nationality operates as a hierarchically structured and situationally activated status cue in judicial decision-making.

Punishment & Society
Macau University of Science and Technology (MO), City University of Hong Kong (HK), Southwestern University of Finance and Economics (CN)
Macau University of Science and Technology
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.