SWOT-TOE framework to alleviate quality assurance in machine learning software system: human-agentic AI approaches

Background The increased use of Machine Learning (ML) systems has posed critical Quality Assurance (QA) issues in areas of security, privacy and performance. Despite advances, QA frameworks for ML remain disjointed. The work examines QA through the Technological, Organizational, and Environmental (TOE) model and proposes human-agentic AI actions to enhance assurance mechanisms. This paper aims to identify, compare and model QA problems in ML software systems and recommend a SWOT-TOE (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats) matrix to enhance human-agentic AI-based QA problems. Methodology The study uses a mixed-method design, which includes systematic literature review (SLR), a quantitative survey, and comparative data modelling. QA issues are coded using the TOE structure and the association tests are linear-by-linear tests to investigate the relationship between the literature and survey results. A SWOT-TOE matrix and mathematical modelling are used to assess key QA issues and to solve them. Results The analysis shows that most of the QA problems revolve around interpretability of models, integrity of data, organizational readiness and regulatory limits. The linear-by-linear association results suggest that there is a strong correlation of the patterns of QA that are identified by the literature and those documented in the survey. Comparative data modeling shows the differences in priorities of QA between the regions. The suggested SWOT-TOE framework combines human-agentic solutions (e.g., adaptive auditing and explainable AI) to enhance QA and security. Conclusion The combination of the TOE framework and human-agentic AI practices and quantitative models allows a systematic approach to solving complex QA problems in ML systems. The research leads to the creation of human-centered, adaptive QA strategies, which foster trust, transparency, and sustainability in AI-powered settings. The framework assists developers, QA engineers, and policymakers to increase security, reliability, and accountability in ML ecosystems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Egyptian Informatics Journal
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eij.2026.100991
Primary Topic
Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SWOT-TOE framework to alleviate quality assurance in machine learning software system: human-agentic AI approaches

Alaa Omran Almagrabi, Musaad Alzahrani, Hathal Salamah Alwageed, Sarra Ayouni et al.
Egyptian Informatics Journal
Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
article

SWOT-TOE framework to alleviate quality assurance in machine learning software system: human-agentic AI approaches

Alaa Omran Almagrabi, Musaad Alzahrani, Hathal Salamah Alwageed, Sarra Ayouni, Ismail Keshta, Rafiq Ahmad Khan
article en

Abstract

Background The increased use of Machine Learning (ML) systems has posed critical Quality Assurance (QA) issues in areas of security, privacy and performance. Despite advances, QA frameworks for ML remain disjointed. The work examines QA through the Technological, Organizational, and Environmental (TOE) model and proposes human-agentic AI actions to enhance assurance mechanisms. This paper aims to identify, compare and model QA problems in ML software systems and recommend a SWOT-TOE (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats) matrix to enhance human-agentic AI-based QA problems. Methodology The study uses a mixed-method design, which includes systematic literature review (SLR), a quantitative survey, and comparative data modelling. QA issues are coded using the TOE structure and the association tests are linear-by-linear tests to investigate the relationship between the literature and survey results. A SWOT-TOE matrix and mathematical modelling are used to assess key QA issues and to solve them. Results The analysis shows that most of the QA problems revolve around interpretability of models, integrity of data, organizational readiness and regulatory limits. The linear-by-linear association results suggest that there is a strong correlation of the patterns of QA that are identified by the literature and those documented in the survey. Comparative data modeling shows the differences in priorities of QA between the regions. The suggested SWOT-TOE framework combines human-agentic solutions (e.g., adaptive auditing and explainable AI) to enhance QA and security. Conclusion The combination of the TOE framework and human-agentic AI practices and quantitative models allows a systematic approach to solving complex QA problems in ML systems. The research leads to the creation of human-centered, adaptive QA strategies, which foster trust, transparency, and sustainability in AI-powered settings. The framework assists developers, QA engineers, and policymakers to increase security, reliability, and accountability in ML ecosystems.

Egyptian Informatics JournalVol. 34
Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University (SA), Alfaisal University (SA), King Abdulaziz University (SA), Jouf University (SA), Al Baha University (SA), University of Malakand (PK)
Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.