Narrating Power The Conventions of Kingship in Twelfth-Century France, 1100-1223

This dissertation analyzes the conventions of French royal power during the long twelfth century. It utilizes a combination of narrative texts, such as a work of political theory, Latin chronicles, and French vernacular romances, the latter of which are especially undervalued by scholars as works of fiction. These sources are read through a lens of narratology, which is a corpus of scholarship that is concerned with the creation of meaning through storytelling. It argues that the ways in which French kings operate, as evidenced by their roles in a given narrative, suggest that kingship and its construction was a topic that many people explored, and understood in the same way, during the twelfth century. Chapter One analyzes the ways in which a work of political theory, John of Salisbury’s Policraticus, describes medieval government and the role of the king, both as an ideal ruler (the princeps) and his opposite, the tyrant. His construction of the ideal royal government is then compared with narrative sources in Chapter Two, which argues that twelfth-century authors who lived before and after John shared, at a fundamental level, expectations of the convention role of an ideal king, which tend to emphasize the monarch’s role as a protector of the kingdom’s people and churches. Chapter Three demonstrates that authors of the twelfth century understood tyrants with the same criteria as John and that the behaviors that they note of a dysfunctional king follow an exact inversion of the conventions of kingship. Chapter Four argues that when a king is distanced from the bureaucratic apparatus that supports his power, especially as seen in crusade narratives, his duties remain consistent, if perhaps more violent. Together, these chapters suggest that one may judge a king according to his attempt to act according to the conventions of his office, which are predicated upon a complex relationship between the incumbent monarch, his subjects, and the Church.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
UNC Libraries
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17615/drwj-zp51
Primary Topic
Medieval Literature and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Narrating Power The Conventions of Kingship in Twelfth-Century France, 1100-1223

Benjamin Comshaw
UNC Libraries
Medieval Literature and History
article

Narrating Power The Conventions of Kingship in Twelfth-Century France, 1100-1223

Benjamin Comshaw
article en

Abstract

This dissertation analyzes the conventions of French royal power during the long twelfth century. It utilizes a combination of narrative texts, such as a work of political theory, Latin chronicles, and French vernacular romances, the latter of which are especially undervalued by scholars as works of fiction. These sources are read through a lens of narratology, which is a corpus of scholarship that is concerned with the creation of meaning through storytelling. It argues that the ways in which French kings operate, as evidenced by their roles in a given narrative, suggest that kingship and its construction was a topic that many people explored, and understood in the same way, during the twelfth century. Chapter One analyzes the ways in which a work of political theory, John of Salisbury’s Policraticus, describes medieval government and the role of the king, both as an ideal ruler (the princeps) and his opposite, the tyrant. His construction of the ideal royal government is then compared with narrative sources in Chapter Two, which argues that twelfth-century authors who lived before and after John shared, at a fundamental level, expectations of the convention role of an ideal king, which tend to emphasize the monarch’s role as a protector of the kingdom’s people and churches. Chapter Three demonstrates that authors of the twelfth century understood tyrants with the same criteria as John and that the behaviors that they note of a dysfunctional king follow an exact inversion of the conventions of kingship. Chapter Four argues that when a king is distanced from the bureaucratic apparatus that supports his power, especially as seen in crusade narratives, his duties remain consistent, if perhaps more violent. Together, these chapters suggest that one may judge a king according to his attempt to act according to the conventions of his office, which are predicated upon a complex relationship between the incumbent monarch, his subjects, and the Church.

UNC Libraries
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Medieval Literature and History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.