‘Guard’ Workout: Can a Lifeguard-Specific High-Intensity Functional Training Reflect Rescue Demands?

Objectives: In lifeguarding, when prevention fails, rapid and safe rescue is essential to prevent submersion and enable appropriate care. These operations demand high physical fitness. High-Intensity Functional Training (HIFT), such as CrossFit®, has become a widely used training model. This study examined the integration of HIFT into lifeguard training to enhance preparedness for aquatic rescues. The aim was to analyse the external and internal load generated by a lifeguard-specific HIFT protocol and to assess its utility both as a training method and as a fitness evaluation tool. Methods: Twenty-seven lifeguards completed a 15 min HIFT protocol in an AMRAP (As Many Rounds As Possible) format with four stations: running, swimming with a tow, victim extraction, and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Variables measured included time per round (TRound), number of completed rounds, maximum and average heart rate (MaxHR, AvgHR), post-exercise blood lactate, rating of perceived exertion (RPE) per round and overall, and CPR quality (Q-CPR). Results: TRound ranged from 238 to 268 s, with significant differences between consecutive rounds, though remaining at submaximal levels. Most participants (74%) completed three rounds, and none completed four. AvgHR was 164 bpm (82% of MaxHR). RPE increased significantly across rounds (p < 0.001), reaching 9 post-AMRAP (p < 0.001). Post-AMRAP blood lactate was 15.50 mmol/L (p < 0.001), indicating high physiological stress. Despite accumulated fatigue, Q-CPR remained consistently high, ranging from 86% to 94%, with no significant differences across rounds. Conclusions: The results of this pilot study suggest that physically active lifeguards can sustain a controlled, high-intensity effort at submaximal heart rates and high perceived exertion without compromising CPR quality. These preliminary findings support the feasibility and potential utility of a lifeguard-specific HIFT programme structured as an AMRAP for high-intensity training and ecological fitness assessment in rescue-specific conditions; formal validation studies are needed before broader recommendations can be made.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk11020218
Primary Topic
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘Guard’ Workout: Can a Lifeguard-Specific High-Intensity Functional Training Reflect Rescue Demands?

R. Barcala-Furelos, Myriam Santos-Folgar, Isaac Ignacio-Rodríguez, Fernando Zarzosa-Alonso et al.
Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
article

‘Guard’ Workout: Can a Lifeguard-Specific High-Intensity Functional Training Reflect Rescue Demands?

R. Barcala-Furelos, Myriam Santos-Folgar, Isaac Ignacio-Rodríguez, Fernando Zarzosa-Alonso, Marcos Sanmartín-Montes, Martín Otero-Agra, Silvia Aranda-García, Oscar Morales-Rejas
article en

Abstract

Objectives: In lifeguarding, when prevention fails, rapid and safe rescue is essential to prevent submersion and enable appropriate care. These operations demand high physical fitness. High-Intensity Functional Training (HIFT), such as CrossFit®, has become a widely used training model. This study examined the integration of HIFT into lifeguard training to enhance preparedness for aquatic rescues. The aim was to analyse the external and internal load generated by a lifeguard-specific HIFT protocol and to assess its utility both as a training method and as a fitness evaluation tool. Methods: Twenty-seven lifeguards completed a 15 min HIFT protocol in an AMRAP (As Many Rounds As Possible) format with four stations: running, swimming with a tow, victim extraction, and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Variables measured included time per round (TRound), number of completed rounds, maximum and average heart rate (MaxHR, AvgHR), post-exercise blood lactate, rating of perceived exertion (RPE) per round and overall, and CPR quality (Q-CPR). Results: TRound ranged from 238 to 268 s, with significant differences between consecutive rounds, though remaining at submaximal levels. Most participants (74%) completed three rounds, and none completed four. AvgHR was 164 bpm (82% of MaxHR). RPE increased significantly across rounds (p < 0.001), reaching 9 post-AMRAP (p < 0.001). Post-AMRAP blood lactate was 15.50 mmol/L (p < 0.001), indicating high physiological stress. Despite accumulated fatigue, Q-CPR remained consistently high, ranging from 86% to 94%, with no significant differences across rounds. Conclusions: The results of this pilot study suggest that physically active lifeguards can sustain a controlled, high-intensity effort at submaximal heart rates and high perceived exertion without compromising CPR quality. These preliminary findings support the feasibility and potential utility of a lifeguard-specific HIFT programme structured as an AMRAP for high-intensity training and ecological fitness assessment in rescue-specific conditions; formal validation studies are needed before broader recommendations can be made.

Journal of Functional Morphology and KinesiologyVol. 11(2)
Complejo Hospitalario de Pontevedra (ES), Institut Nacional d'Educació Física de Catalunya (ES), Universidade de Vigo (ES)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.