Managed as offenders, ignored as survivors: Modern slavery, criminalisation, and the gaps in practice provision

This paper explores how people encounter the criminal justice system, as well as related support services for those victims of modern slavery who also have a history of offending. Drawing on a focus group with three participants, the study examines how moral complexity, bureaucratic rigidity, and systemic misunderstanding shape processes of rehabilitation and engagement with UK modern slavery support and criminal justice systems. Participants described deep frustration at being simultaneously managed as offenders and overlooked as survivors, highlighting the limitations of current trauma-informed approaches when faced with non-stereotypical victim–offender identities. The paper situates these findings within contemporary debates on trauma-informed care, responsivity, and desistance, and argues for reforms that embed lived experience more deeply in system design, strengthen cross-sector continuity of care, and position probation as a relational and reparative form of rehabilitation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Probation Journal
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02645505261452026
Primary Topic
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Managed as offenders, ignored as survivors: Modern slavery, criminalisation, and the gaps in practice provision

Nicola Wright, Ben Brewster
Probation Journal
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
article

Managed as offenders, ignored as survivors: Modern slavery, criminalisation, and the gaps in practice provision

Nicola Wright, Ben Brewster
article en

Abstract

This paper explores how people encounter the criminal justice system, as well as related support services for those victims of modern slavery who also have a history of offending. Drawing on a focus group with three participants, the study examines how moral complexity, bureaucratic rigidity, and systemic misunderstanding shape processes of rehabilitation and engagement with UK modern slavery support and criminal justice systems. Participants described deep frustration at being simultaneously managed as offenders and overlooked as survivors, highlighting the limitations of current trauma-informed approaches when faced with non-stereotypical victim–offender identities. The paper situates these findings within contemporary debates on trauma-informed care, responsivity, and desistance, and argues for reforms that embed lived experience more deeply in system design, strengthen cross-sector continuity of care, and position probation as a relational and reparative form of rehabilitation.

Probation Journal
University of Nottingham (GB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.