Principy kriminalizace

This article examines the principles that should guide decisions on whether to criminalize certain conduct. Drawing on the works of Ashworth, Horder, Simester, von Hirsch, Duff, Husak, Hörnle, and other prominent scholars, it identifies and synthesizes the key principles of criminalization – the harm principle, the wrongfulness principle, the public wrong principle, and the principle of effective and proportional regulation. On this basis, the article proposes a seven-point checklist providing practical guidance for assessing the appropriateness of criminal sanctions for a given act. The checklist applies only those principles on which a significant number of legal theorists agree, reflecting the widely shared view that no single universal principle can answer all questions of criminalization. The article concludes that these principles are generally well reflected in Czech criminal law, but highlights concerns about overly broad statutory definitions and insufficient use of alternatives to criminalization. It suggests that further development of domain-specific criminalization theories and a more rigorous constitutional review of criminal offences could strengthen the coherence of Czech criminal law.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
AUC IURIDICA
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14712/23366478.2026.90
Primary Topic
Criminal Law and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Principy kriminalizace

Šimon Otruba
AUC IURIDICA
Criminal Law and Policy
article

Principy kriminalizace

Šimon Otruba
article en

Abstract

This article examines the principles that should guide decisions on whether to criminalize certain conduct. Drawing on the works of Ashworth, Horder, Simester, von Hirsch, Duff, Husak, Hörnle, and other prominent scholars, it identifies and synthesizes the key principles of criminalization – the harm principle, the wrongfulness principle, the public wrong principle, and the principle of effective and proportional regulation. On this basis, the article proposes a seven-point checklist providing practical guidance for assessing the appropriateness of criminal sanctions for a given act. The checklist applies only those principles on which a significant number of legal theorists agree, reflecting the widely shared view that no single universal principle can answer all questions of criminalization. The article concludes that these principles are generally well reflected in Czech criminal law, but highlights concerns about overly broad statutory definitions and insufficient use of alternatives to criminalization. It suggests that further development of domain-specific criminalization theories and a more rigorous constitutional review of criminal offences could strengthen the coherence of Czech criminal law.

AUC IURIDICAVol. 72(2)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Criminal Law and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.