Regionalization Without a Roadmap: Stakeholder Conceptions of ASEAN Integration at Vietnam National University Hanoi

This study examines stakeholder conceptions of regionalization of higher education at Vietnam National University Hanoi (VNU). Regionalization remains unevenly understood in Southeast Asia and often overshadowed by internationalization discourses. Drawing on document analysis and semi-structured interviews with administrators, faculty, and students, the study explores how regionalization is enacted through student mobility programs. Findings reveal divergent rationales: administrators highlight political prestige and institutional reputation; faculty emphasize academic quality and professional development; while students focus on cultural and personal growth. Regionalization unfolds largely de facto, driven by bilateral scholarships and East Asian partnerships rather than intentional ASEAN strategies. Challenges include fragmented coordination, language barriers, and unequal access. The study offers a critical snapshot of regionalization in a semi-peripheral context, complicating top-down models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Comparative & International Higher Education
Published
2026-05-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64899/2151-0407.1872
Primary Topic
Higher Education Governance and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Regionalization Without a Roadmap: Stakeholder Conceptions of ASEAN Integration at Vietnam National University Hanoi

Phuong T Nguyen
Journal of Comparative & International Higher Education
Higher Education Governance and Development
article

Regionalization Without a Roadmap: Stakeholder Conceptions of ASEAN Integration at Vietnam National University Hanoi

Phuong T Nguyen
article en

Abstract

This study examines stakeholder conceptions of regionalization of higher education at Vietnam National University Hanoi (VNU). Regionalization remains unevenly understood in Southeast Asia and often overshadowed by internationalization discourses. Drawing on document analysis and semi-structured interviews with administrators, faculty, and students, the study explores how regionalization is enacted through student mobility programs. Findings reveal divergent rationales: administrators highlight political prestige and institutional reputation; faculty emphasize academic quality and professional development; while students focus on cultural and personal growth. Regionalization unfolds largely de facto, driven by bilateral scholarships and East Asian partnerships rather than intentional ASEAN strategies. Challenges include fragmented coordination, language barriers, and unequal access. The study offers a critical snapshot of regionalization in a semi-peripheral context, complicating top-down models.

Journal of Comparative & International Higher EducationVol. 18(3)
Vietnam National University, Hanoi (VN)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Higher Education Governance and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.