Comparative Pharmacokinetics of Two Extended‐Release Tablet Formulations of Upadacitinib: Bioequivalence Assessment

Abstract The aim of this study is to evaluate the pharmacokinetic characteristics, bioequivalence, and safety of two brands of upadacitinib (UPA) extended‐release tablets (15 mg) in healthy Chinese subjects under fasting and postprandial conditions. The plasma concentration of UPA was determined by ultra‐high‐performance liquid chromatography‐tandem mass spectrometry, and pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using a non‐compartmental model (NCA module) with Phoenix WinNonlin 8.2 (Certara, USA) software, followed by bioequivalence evaluation. The results demonstrate that the 90% confidence intervals for the geometric least‐squares mean ratios of C max , AUC 0–t , and AUC 0–∞ between the test and reference formulations fall within the range of 0.80−1.25, indicating that both formulations are bioequivalent in terms of absorption rate and extent under fasting and postprandial conditions. No serious adverse events occurred, and observed drug‐related adverse events were mild under both conditions, indicating comparable safety of the two formulations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cpdd.70073
Primary Topic
Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Pharmacokinetics of Two Extended‐Release Tablet Formulations of Upadacitinib: Bioequivalence Assessment

Fangliang Gan, Li Zhao, Qiong Zhan, Biao Sun
Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development
Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
article

Comparative Pharmacokinetics of Two Extended‐Release Tablet Formulations of Upadacitinib: Bioequivalence Assessment

Fangliang Gan, Li Zhao, Qiong Zhan, Biao Sun
article en

Abstract

Abstract The aim of this study is to evaluate the pharmacokinetic characteristics, bioequivalence, and safety of two brands of upadacitinib (UPA) extended‐release tablets (15 mg) in healthy Chinese subjects under fasting and postprandial conditions. The plasma concentration of UPA was determined by ultra‐high‐performance liquid chromatography‐tandem mass spectrometry, and pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using a non‐compartmental model (NCA module) with Phoenix WinNonlin 8.2 (Certara, USA) software, followed by bioequivalence evaluation. The results demonstrate that the 90% confidence intervals for the geometric least‐squares mean ratios of C max , AUC 0–t , and AUC 0–∞ between the test and reference formulations fall within the range of 0.80−1.25, indicating that both formulations are bioequivalent in terms of absorption rate and extent under fasting and postprandial conditions. No serious adverse events occurred, and observed drug‐related adverse events were mild under both conditions, indicating comparable safety of the two formulations.

Clinical Pharmacology in Drug DevelopmentVol. 15(6)
Xianning Central Hospital (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.