Impact of surgeon experience level on outcomes of three different root coverage procedures for RT1 gingival recession

BACKGROUND: Gingival recession (GR) is a common dental condition. Root coverage procedures (RCPs) aim to restore the gingival margin to its original position and maximize root surface coverage. The impact of surgeon experience on surgical outcomes has not been systematically evaluated. This retrospective study aimed to investigate the impact of surgeon experience level on the outcomes of 3 different RCPs for RT1 GR by comprehensively assessing clinical and esthetic parameters before and after surgery. RESULTS: A total of 304 patients (1,020 teeth) were included in this study. Surgeons with more than 5 years of experience achieved a significantly higher percentage of root coverage (PRC) (96.34 ± 10.95%) and significantly lower clinical attachment level (CAL) values (1.20 ± 0.42 mm) than less experienced surgeons (p < 0.05). Notably, surgical duration decreased markedly with increasing surgical experience (p < 0.0001). The root coverage esthetic score (RES) did not differ significantly among the three groups. Group A demonstrated higher mucosal scar index (MSI) values for the coronally advanced flap combined with connective tissue graft (CAF + CTG). CONCLUSION: Surgeon experience level is associated with clinical efficacy and surgical efficiency in RCPs, with more experienced surgeons achieving superior PRC and attachment gain. Esthetic outcomes were comparable across experience levels. Additionally, more experienced surgeons had shorter operative times.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40902-026-00514-y
Primary Topic
Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of surgeon experience level on outcomes of three different root coverage procedures for RT1 gingival recession

Wentao Sun, Mengjun Sun, Dong Jiachen, Y Liao et al.
Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
article

Impact of surgeon experience level on outcomes of three different root coverage procedures for RT1 gingival recession

Wentao Sun, Mengjun Sun, Dong Jiachen, Y Liao, Z C Song
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Gingival recession (GR) is a common dental condition. Root coverage procedures (RCPs) aim to restore the gingival margin to its original position and maximize root surface coverage. The impact of surgeon experience on surgical outcomes has not been systematically evaluated. This retrospective study aimed to investigate the impact of surgeon experience level on the outcomes of 3 different RCPs for RT1 GR by comprehensively assessing clinical and esthetic parameters before and after surgery. RESULTS: A total of 304 patients (1,020 teeth) were included in this study. Surgeons with more than 5 years of experience achieved a significantly higher percentage of root coverage (PRC) (96.34 ± 10.95%) and significantly lower clinical attachment level (CAL) values (1.20 ± 0.42 mm) than less experienced surgeons (p < 0.05). Notably, surgical duration decreased markedly with increasing surgical experience (p < 0.0001). The root coverage esthetic score (RES) did not differ significantly among the three groups. Group A demonstrated higher mucosal scar index (MSI) values for the coronally advanced flap combined with connective tissue graft (CAF + CTG). CONCLUSION: Surgeon experience level is associated with clinical efficacy and surgical efficiency in RCPs, with more experienced surgeons achieving superior PRC and attachment gain. Esthetic outcomes were comparable across experience levels. Additionally, more experienced surgeons had shorter operative times.

Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, National Key Research and Development Program of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.