Constituting Self-Government: Thomas Burke, the Coming of the Revolution in North Carolina, and the Background to the Articles of Confederation

Abstract: This article reexamines North Carolina's revolutionary trajectory by locating the colony's break with Britain not in imperial taxation alone but in a profound constitutional rupture precipitated by the Foreign Attachment Controversy. The conflict between the Assembly and Governor Josiah Martin over the status of attachment laws exposed the fragility of the empire's customary system of negotiated authority rooted in principles of consent, customary law, and the shared sovereignty that the North Carolina Assembly believed defined the imperial constitution. Amid this crisis, Thomas Burke emerged as a central figure articulating a whig political vocabulary that linked resistance to the defense of local autonomy. His work in the provincial congress demonstrated a coherent vision of popular sovereignty and the need to bind governmental power through explicit constitutional barriers. Burke's experience in North Carolina informed his later intervention in the debates over the Articles of Confederation, where he sought to preserve state authority within the emerging federal structure.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Transactions of the American Philosophical Society
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/tap.2026.a991358
Primary Topic
American Constitutional Law and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Constituting Self-Government: Thomas Burke, the Coming of the Revolution in North Carolina, and the Background to the Articles of Confederation

Adam L. Tate, Aaron N. Coleman
Transactions of the American Philosophical Society
American Constitutional Law and Politics
article

Constituting Self-Government: Thomas Burke, the Coming of the Revolution in North Carolina, and the Background to the Articles of Confederation

Adam L. Tate, Aaron N. Coleman
article en

Abstract

Abstract: This article reexamines North Carolina's revolutionary trajectory by locating the colony's break with Britain not in imperial taxation alone but in a profound constitutional rupture precipitated by the Foreign Attachment Controversy. The conflict between the Assembly and Governor Josiah Martin over the status of attachment laws exposed the fragility of the empire's customary system of negotiated authority rooted in principles of consent, customary law, and the shared sovereignty that the North Carolina Assembly believed defined the imperial constitution. Amid this crisis, Thomas Burke emerged as a central figure articulating a whig political vocabulary that linked resistance to the defense of local autonomy. His work in the provincial congress demonstrated a coherent vision of popular sovereignty and the need to bind governmental power through explicit constitutional barriers. Burke's experience in North Carolina informed his later intervention in the debates over the Articles of Confederation, where he sought to preserve state authority within the emerging federal structure.

Transactions of the American Philosophical SocietyVol. 115(2)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
American Constitutional Law and Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.