A Social Identity Model of Leadership Development Implementation

Despite substantial investment in leadership development, organizations often struggle to implement relevant programs effectively. This reflects the fact that the success of program implementation is contingent on identity dynamics. Building on the social identity model of leadership, the ASPIRe model, and evidence-based programs such as 5R that apply these principles, we argue that, to be effective, implementation needs to ensure that the approach makes sense for “us,” aligns with who “we” are, and fits with “our” leadership. To guide this process, we present a social identity model of leadership development implementation (SIMoLDI) which specifies four phases of effective implementation: (1) identity activation, (2) identity alignment, (3) identity actualization, and (4) identity anchoring. Each phase draws on distinct identity leadership components: prototypicality, entrepreneurship, advancement, and impresarioship. The principles we outline have general relevance in providing a practical, theory-informed framework for translating leadership development initiatives into sustainable practice, while being particularly applicable when leadership development is focused on building collective capability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Academy of Management Learning and Education
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2024.0546
Primary Topic
Education, Leadership, and Health Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Social Identity Model of Leadership Development Implementation

Niklas K. Steffens, S. Alexander Haslam, Blake McMillan, Kim Peters et al.
Academy of Management Learning and Education
Education, Leadership, and Health Research
article

A Social Identity Model of Leadership Development Implementation

Niklas K. Steffens, S. Alexander Haslam, Blake McMillan, Kim Peters, Tyree Mitchell
article en

Abstract

Despite substantial investment in leadership development, organizations often struggle to implement relevant programs effectively. This reflects the fact that the success of program implementation is contingent on identity dynamics. Building on the social identity model of leadership, the ASPIRe model, and evidence-based programs such as 5R that apply these principles, we argue that, to be effective, implementation needs to ensure that the approach makes sense for “us,” aligns with who “we” are, and fits with “our” leadership. To guide this process, we present a social identity model of leadership development implementation (SIMoLDI) which specifies four phases of effective implementation: (1) identity activation, (2) identity alignment, (3) identity actualization, and (4) identity anchoring. Each phase draws on distinct identity leadership components: prototypicality, entrepreneurship, advancement, and impresarioship. The principles we outline have general relevance in providing a practical, theory-informed framework for translating leadership development initiatives into sustainable practice, while being particularly applicable when leadership development is focused on building collective capability.

Academy of Management Learning and Education
Louisiana State University (US), The University of Queensland (AU), University of Exeter (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Education, Leadership, and Health Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.